跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01483807
NCT01483807已完成不适用

Treatments of Acquired Apraxia of Speech

VA Office of Research and Development2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2011年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Speech Production: Effect Size for Treated Items

研究概览

简要总结

This study was designed to examine the effects of speech therapy on ability to produce speech sounds in persons with acquired apraxia of speech.

详细描述

This study was designed to investigate the effects of Sound Production Treatment (SPT; a treatment for acquired apraxia of speech) on sound production accuracy in persons with chronic apraxia of speech (AOS). Organization of practice (blocked practice or randomized practice) will be manipulated in an effort to determine the most efficacious application of SPT. A combination of group and single-subject experimental designs wasl be completed with 20 speakers with AOS (2 groups of 10 participants).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Must have acquired apraxia of speech that occurred following a stroke or other brain injury.
  • Must be at least 6 months post-onset of brain injury.
  • May have aphasia.

排除标准

  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • History of mental illness.
  • Neurological condition other than that which resulted in apraxia of speech.

研究组 & 干预措施

SPT-B then SPT-R

Experimental

Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks. After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions. Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.

干预措施: Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (Behavioral)

SPT-B then SPT-R

Experimental

Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks. After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions. Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.

干预措施: Sound Production Treatment - Random (Behavioral)

SPT-R then SPT-B

Experimental

Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks. After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions. Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.

干预措施: Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (Behavioral)

SPT-R then SPT-B

Experimental

Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks. After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions. Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.

干预措施: Sound Production Treatment - Random (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Speech Production: Effect Size for Treated Items

时间窗: Pre treatment (2-3 week period preceding the start of treatment) vs. 10 weeks post all treatment

Change in accuracy of articulation of trained items as measured from baseline to 10 weeks post treatment using effect size calculations as the indicator of magnitude of change; production of words designated for treatment was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (maximum = 100%, minimum = 0% correct). Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance). The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment. Positive effect sizes = increases in accuracy \& negative effect sizes = decreases in accuracy.

Speech Production: Percent Change in Treated Items

时间窗: baseline to 10 weeks post treatment

Change in accuracy of articulation of treated items as measured by percent increase in accuracy above the highest baseline measurement; production of words designated for treatment was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (0% to 100% correct). The highest percentage accuracy achieved in pre-treatment probes was subtracted from the percentage accuracy achieved at 10 weeks post-treatment to obtain change in accuracy value - this reflects change from maximum correct performance in baseline (pre-treatment). e.g., if in baseline probes, performance ranged from 10% to 30% accuracy and at post treatment performance was 90% accuracy, the change value would be 60% (90% minus 30%). A greater change value indicates greater change in articulation/production of words. Change could be positive (improved articulation) or negative (poorer articulation).

次要结局

  • Speech Production of Untrained Items: Effect Sizes for Untrained Items(Baseline vs. 10 weeks post all treatment)
  • Speech Production: Percent Change in Untrained Items(baseline to 10 weeks post treatment)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验