跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07186894
NCT07186894进行中(未招募)不适用

Effectiveness and Safety of Cefazolin Versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: a Multicentre Real-world Evaluation Using the International TriNetX Database

Central Hospital, Nancy, France0 个研究点目标入组 5,000 人开始时间: 2000年1月1日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
5,000
主要终点
90 days all-cause mortality

研究概览

简要总结

Background Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia is a common and serious infection, associated with significant morbidity and high mortality rates. Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) have traditionally been recommended as the first-line treatment. However, this established position has recently been challenged by meta-analyses suggesting that cefazolin may provide comparable efficacy, along with a more favourable safety profile. Further clinical and real-world studies are warranted to substantiate these findings.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of cefazolin compared with ASPs in the management of MSSA bacteraemia.

详细描述

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a frequent cause of bacteraemia and is associated with high mortality rates. Several studies have reported an increasing incidence over recent decades, accompanied by a decline in the prevalence of methicillin-resistant strains. In a recent meta-analysis by Bai et al., mortality related to S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) remained substantial: 18.1% at one month, 27.0% at three months, and 30.2% at one year.

In the absence of specific international guidelines supported by randomised controlled trials, the management of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections largely relies on expert consensus and clinical experience. For several decades, antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) have been regarded as the gold standard for treating MSSA bacteraemia. This preference was primarily based on concerns regarding the so-called "inoculum effect," whereby the efficacy of cefazolin might be reduced at high bacterial loads .

However, recurring global shortages of ASPs have led clinicians to consider cefazolin as a viable first-line alternative. In this context, several meta-analyses, albeit based on observational data, have suggested that cefazolin provides similar efficacy with a more favourable safety profile than ASPs . Nonetheless, these results remain subject to confounding and bias and must be confirmed through randomised controlled trials, two of which are currently ongoing.

Large, real-world evaluations are therefore needed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of cefazolin and ASPs in routine clinical settings. The TriNetX platform offers access to real-time, real-world global hospital data, thereby enabling large-scale comparative analyses in an international context. Against this background, the present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cefazolin versus ASPs in the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia using data from the TriNetX database.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • In the cefazolin group : Cefazolin injectable prescription in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia
  • In the ASPs group :ASPs injectable prescription (flucloxacillin, floxacillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, nafcillin and dicloxacillin) in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

排除标准

  • In the cefazolin group : ASP injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia
  • In the ASPs group : cefazolin injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

研究组 & 干预措施

Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs)

ASPs group

Inclusion criteria

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) injectable prescription (flucloxacillin, floxacillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, nafcillin and dicloxacillin) in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

Exclusion criteria : cefazolin injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

干预措施: Antistaphylococcal penicillins (Drug)

Cefazolin

Cefazolin group

Inclusion criteria

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • Cefazolin injectable prescription in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

Exclusion criteria : ASP injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

干预措施: Cefazolin (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

90 days all-cause mortality

时间窗: 90 days after the inclusion

All-cause mortality, at day 90

次要结局

  • All-cause mortality measured at other timeframes(day 7, day 30, and 1 year)
  • Safety outcomes(30 or 90 days after the inclusion)

研究者

发起方
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

LEFEVRE Benjamin

Doctor (MD PhD)

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

相似试验