Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 入组人数
- 350
- 主要终点
- Mesh exposure
研究概览
简要总结
Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Mesh exposure
时间窗: One year
次要结局
- Pain(One year)
- Dyspareunia(One year)
