NCT03489902已完成不适用
Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair Trial
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 主要终点
- Operative data
研究概览
简要总结
Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
详细描述
trial comparing the transobturator paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 50 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •paravaginal defect cystocele
- •midline and paravaginal defect cystocele
排除标准
- •uterine descent previous cystocele surgery
结局指标
主要结局
Operative data
时间窗: 1 day
Operative time
次要结局
- Operative Details(1 day)
- Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system(3 month)
研究者
Hamdy Ahmed Saaid
Fellow of obstetrics & gynecology
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Xenform Postmarket Surveillance StudyPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT01945580Boston Scientific Corporation374
已完成
不适用
Uphold LITE Post-Market Surveillance StudyPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT01917968Boston Scientific Corporation289
已完成
不适用
Transobturator Approach for Paravaginal RepairCystoceleNCT02735772Ain Shams Maternity Hospital20
已完成
不适用
Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Extraction of Laparoscopically-excised SpecimenUrologic NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteColorectal NeoplasmsNCT05113134Seoul National University Bundang Hospital38
Unknown
不适用
TAMIS-IPAA vs. Lap-IPAA for Ulcerative ColitiisPostoperative ComplicationsIleal PouchUlcerative ColitisNCT03536988Jinling Hospital, China84