Cerebral Aneurysms: a Retrospective Study on the Experience in Our Hospital With a Comparative Analysis Between the Different Techniques Used in Its Treatment

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage continues to have very high morbidity and mortality rates, despite the years elapsed and repeated attempts to reduce it.

Stabilizing the aneurysm by embolization or surgical clipping leaves unresolved the vasospasm, responsible for ischemic brain damage, causing neurological sequelae and cognitive impairment.

It has long been known that the deoxyhemoglobin liberated from the extravasated red blood cells retained in the subarachnoid clot is the leading cause of vasospasm. Different routes have been tried to minimize its deleterious effects, such as copious lavage of the skull base cisterns, lysing the subarachnoid clot with urokinase or rtPA, administration of vitamin C, iron chelators, or superoxydodismutase-like drugs.

The volume of subarachnoid hemorrhage was soon correlated with the vasospasm severity. Once this fact was known in the 1980s and 1990s, cisternal lavage was used extensively during aneurysms' surgical clipping. Clots located in the subarachnoid space were lysed with urokinase or rtPA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator), showing positive effects, particularly evident for the most severe bleeds, those with Fisher's grades of 3 or higher.

However, the introduction of embolization changed the treatment paradigm. As the craniotomy is not carried out, the cisterns are not usually washed, which controls the rebleeding but not the vasospasm. To date, we are not aware of any study that compares the effect on vasospasm of embolization versus clipping of aneurysms with lavage of the cisterns using thrombolytic agents.