跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06969040
NCT06969040招募中不适用

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Standard Cognitive Behavioural Therapy + Transcranial Alternating Current in the Treatment of Refractory Insomnia Disorder

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2024年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Differences in change from baseline in Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores at the end of treatment in the two groups

研究概览

简要总结

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of CBTI + transcranial alternating current (TAC) technology in the treatment of refractory insomnia and the mechanism of 'cognitive-behavioural-brain network' interactions.

详细描述

Difficult to treat insomnia is a sleep disorder that significantly reduces the quality of sleep for patients, seriously affecting their daily work and study. At present, the main treatment method for refractory insomnia in clinical practice is drug therapy. The problems with drug therapy mainly include easy recurrence after discontinuation and the need for long-term or even lifelong medication. However, tolerance or other adverse reactions limit its long-term use. In recent years, studies have shown that cognitive-behavioral therapy and transcranial alternating current stimulation are effective in treating chronic insomnia, prolonging sleep time and improving sleep quality. However, there have been no reports on the efficacy and safety of CBTI combined with tACS in the treatment of refractory insomnia. Based on the important role of tACS in regulating cortical excitability and spontaneous EEG activity, as well as the precise efficacy of CBTI in improving insomnia, we plan to use CBTI combined with tACS to treat refractory insomnia disorders, in order to improve the effectiveness of treatment. This study adopts a randomized double-blind controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of CBT+tACS in the treatment of refractory insomnia, aiming to provide a basis for clinical data of CBT+tACS in the treatment of refractory insomnia.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Meets the diagnostic criteria for insomnia in DSM-5;
  • •Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total score>5 points;
  • •Age ≥ 18 years old, with a junior high school education or above;
  • •Voluntarily participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

排除标准

  • •Individuals with severe physical or mental illnesses are at risk of suicide;
  • •Clinically diagnosed or suspected sleep breathing disorders, restless leg syndrome, and sleep wake rhythm disorders, as well as workers on rotating shifts;
  • •Pregnant and lactating women;
  • •Currently undergoing any psychological therapy.

研究组 & 干预措施

CBTI+tACS

Experimental

干预措施: CBTI + tACS (Other)

CBTI + Sham tACS

Sham Comparator

干预措施: CBTI + Sham tACS (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Differences in change from baseline in Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores at the end of treatment in the two groups

时间窗: Baseline to week 6

次要结局

  • Differences in changes in PSQI scores compared to baseline during follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups(Baseline to week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12)
  • Differences in the changes in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores from baseline at the end of treatment and follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups(Baseline to week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12)
  • Differences in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores between the two groups at the end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline.(Baseline to week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12)
  • Differences in changes in sleep hygiene awareness and practice scale (SHAPS) between the two groups compared to baseline at the end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of follow-up [2].(Baseline to week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12)
  • Differences in changes in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores between the two groups at the end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline.(Baseline to week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验