跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02824744
NCT02824744已完成不适用

Comparison Between 2l/Min/kg vs 3l/Min/kg in High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants

University Hospital, Montpellier2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2016年11月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
300
试验地点
2
主要终点
Proportion of failure in both arms

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of 2 different flow with High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.

Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS >3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups:HFNC "2l/min/kg" or HFNC "3l/min/kg" during 24 hours.

Conditions of measurements:

Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours.

Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2

Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis.

Expected number of patients: 135 per arm: 270 children.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Hours 至 6 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age < 6 months
  • bronchiolitis
  • mWCAS > or =3
  • hospitalisation: PICU
  • signed consent form by parents

排除标准

  • Intubated patient
  • Neurological or cardiac disease

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of failure in both arms

时间窗: up to 24 hours

Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

次要结局

  • Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN(up to 24 hours)
  • assessment of heart rate in both arm(up to 24 hours)
  • number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms (mWCAS)(up to 24 hours)
  • assessment of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in both arms(up to 24 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验