跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01865851
NCT01865851Unknown不适用

Comparison of the Classic Face Mask Versus NuMask for Preoxygenation

Nimmagadda, Usharani, M.D.2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2013年5月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Inspired (FIO2)

研究概览

简要总结

Currently used face mask has certain disadvantages; such as, not providing a complete seal in certain patients, causing hand fatigue after holding the mask in place for more than a few minutes, causing claustrophobia in an occasional patient, the need to hold the mask from head of the bed, and possible worsening of the trauma in patients with facial injuries, and the need to use different size masks in different patients. The NuMask overcomes all of these disadvantages and does benefit the patients.

详细描述

The administration of oxygen before anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation (preoxygenation) is a well-recognized technique designed to increase oxygen reserves and thereby delay the onset of arterial oxygen desaturation during apnea. It is particularly important if manual ventilation is not desirable prior to intubation (eg: rapid sequence induction) or if difficulty with ventilation or intubation is anticipated or in patients with oxygen transport limitations. Because the "cannot ventilate/cannot intubate" situation is an unpredictable event, theoretically all patients should be maximally preoxygenated.

Fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) is one of the factors in achieving maximal preoxygenation. A common reason for the failure to achieve an FIO2 close to 1.0 is a leak under the face mask. Several factors may contribute to the leak. These are edentulous patients, patients with sunken cheeks, bearded patients, the presence of nasogastric tubes, wrong size face masks, improper use of head straps, and patients with large heads and faces where even the large size mask may not fit properly.

Recently a new intraoral mask "NuMask" has become available for anesthetic induction. It is placed under the lips and outside the gums of the patient mouth (similar to snorkel mouth piece), thus providing a good seal in almost any patient. In addition to providing a good seal, the NuMask has other advantages over the standard face mask. It has very small dead space (18 cc : 110 cc), provides comfortable grip, ventilation can be provided from any position and causes less facial trauma.

The efficacy of preoxygenation using the NuMask will be compared to the classic face mask in approximately 30 healthy and consenting adult volunteers. All of the volunteers will be randomly assigned into one of 2 groups. All volunteers will be tested for three (3) periods of 5 minute intervals. Inspired oxygen (FIO2), end-tidal oxygen (ETO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and respiratory rate (RR) will be tested. Analysis of the data may reveal whether the NuMask is equal, superior, or inferior to the classic face mask in achieving maximal preoxygenation.

Although the NuMask has been tested and used in various scenarios of airway management, its efficacy in achieving maximal preoxygenation has not been studied

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • volunteers

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Start with Classic Face Mask Group

Active Comparator

The volunteers will be asked to breathe normally (Tidal Volume Breathing) through face mask for 5 minutes. After 5 minutes, the volunteers will be asked to breathe room air for 5 minutes and then breathe through a NuMask for 5 minutes. This will be followed by room air breathing for 5 minutes. At the end of the 5 minutes of room air breathing, the same volunteers will be asked to breathe through the face mask for 5 minutes.

干预措施: Classic Face Mask and NuMask (Device)

Start with NuMask Group

Active Comparator

The volunteers will be asked to breathe through the NuMask for 5 minutes, followed by room air breathing for 5 minutes, then 5 minutes of breathing through the face mask. This will be followed by room air breathing for 5 minutes and then 5 minutes of NuMask breathing.

干预措施: Classic Face Mask and NuMask (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Inspired (FIO2)

时间窗: 30 minutes

Healthy volunteers will be randomly breathing 100% oxygen through either a classic face mask or NuMask for 5 minutes. Measurements will be taken every 30 seconds. The purpose of the study is to evaluate which mask will provide maximal pre-oxygenation (more than 90% end-tidal oxygen).

次要结局

  • ETO2(30 minutres)
  • ETCO2(30 minutes)
  • Respiratory Rate(30 minutes)

研究者

发起方
Nimmagadda, Usharani, M.D.
申办方类型
Indiv
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Usharani Nimmagadda

Anesthesiologist

Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of the Classic Face Mask Versus NuMask... | 临床试验