Comparison of effect of mulligan mobilisation with movement along with kinesio taping vs maitland mobilisaton along with k taping on pain and function in knee osteoarithritis patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 43
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Pain measured by NPRS SCALE
研究概览
简要总结
TITLECOMPARISON OF EFFECTOF MULLIGAN MOBILISATION WITH MOVEMENTAND KINESIO TAPING VERSUS MAITLAND MOBILISATION ALONG WITH KINESIO TAPING ONPAIN AND FUNCTION IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
METHODOLOGY
In group 1 : Mulligan MWM and Kinesio taping and taping is done for 2 times weekly will be given to the patients that includes the rotational glide in supine lying position and mobilisation with traction for 15 minutes 6-8 repetition for 3 sets along with conventional exercises .
The conventional treatment include hot pack , TENS and exercises include isometrics for quadriceps , hamstring and adductors . other exercises are straight leg raise in supine side lying and prone position and gradually as the condition of the patient improves it includes weight training and the duration of the whole session will be 30-45 minutes the patient will be taught the exercises for home and after one week follow up readings will be taken again
In group 2 : Maitland mobilization along with kinesio taping that is done twice a week that includes posterior to anterior mobilisation that include oscillations upto Grade 3 which include 1-2 oscillation per second given for 15 minutes .The conventional treatment include hot pack , TENS and exercises include isometrics for quadriceps , hamstring and adductors . other exercises are straight leg raise in supine side lying and prone position and gradually as the condition of the patient improves it includes weight training and the duration of the whole session will be 30-45 minutes the patient will be taught the exercises for home and after one week follow up readings will be taken again
Discussison
The aim of the study is to compare the two techniques along with kinesio taping and to determine the best treatment possible for the knee osteoarthritis patient
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •BMI ranging from 23-31 Both Male and Female Crepitus upto Grade 1 according to knee crepitus scale Knee joint stiffness that is restricting movements at knee ie flexion and extension Individuals who met the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for knee osteoarthritis •Clinically/radiologically diagnosed case of Grade 2 and Grade 3 bilateral / unilateral knee osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification.
排除标准
- •Allergy to tape Active Infection and Acute pain and inflammation of knee joint Grade 4 Osteoarthritis Recent history of Trauma in lower limb that will hamper the participation of individual in the study Not willing to participate in the study.
结局指标
主要结局
Pain measured by NPRS SCALE
时间窗: At baseline (day 0) , post intervention (week 2) . Follow up will be done after 2 weeks
Knee joint range of motion By Goniometer
时间窗: At baseline (day 0) , post intervention (week 2) . Follow up will be done after 2 weeks
次要结局
- Functional status of joint by WOMAC SCALE(At baseline (day 0) , post intervention (week 2) . Follow up will be done after 2 weeks)