跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02372305
NCT02372305撤回4 期

Comparison of FlexHD and Alloderm Outcomes in Breast Reconstructive Surgery

University of Arkansas2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2016年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Wound Dehiscence

研究概览

简要总结

FlexHD and Alloderm are two common products used in breast reconstruction to hold tissue expanders and implants in place. There have been few chart review studies comparing outcomes between the two materials in breast reconstruction. These studies have determined there is no difference in complication rates between the two materials. However, there have never been any active studies to date. This study will serve as a randomized controlled trial comparing FlexHD and Alloderm. Several outcomes will be measured based off of inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine if either product is more suitable for use in breast reconstruction. This will be performed by randomly assigning patients to receive either FlexHD or Alloderm. Designated outcomes will be followed closely postoperatively. Outcomes will be statistically analyzed to determine complication rates between FlexHD and Alloderm and thus which product is better to use in breast reconstruction.

详细描述

FlexHD and Alloderm are two common products used in breast reconstruction to hold tissue expanders and implants in place. There have been few chart review studies comparing outcomes between the two materials in breast reconstruction. These studies have determined there is no difference in complication rates between the two materials. However, there have never been any active studies to date. This study will serve as a randomized controlled trial comparing FlexHD and Alloderm. Several outcomes will be measured based off of inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine if either product is more suitable for use in breast reconstruction. This will be performed by randomly assigning patients to receive either FlexHD or Alloderm. Designated outcomes will be followed closely postoperatively. Outcomes will be statistically analyzed to determine complication rates between FlexHD and Alloderm and thus which product is better to use in breast reconstruction

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • No Prior Breast Radiation
  • No Prior Breast Reduction
  • No Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM and non-IDDM)
  • Non-smoker or quit >6 weeks prior
  • No breast implants or prior breast implants
  • No inflammatory or autoimmune disorders
  • No current anticoagulation therapy
  • No current pregnant

排除标准

  • BMI > 30
  • Prior Breast Radiation
  • Diabetes Mellitus - IDDM and non IDDM
  • Prior Breast Reduction
  • Active Smoker or Recently Quit <6 weeks
  • Prior Breast Implants
  • Inflammatory/Autoimmune Condition (ex. Lupus)
  • Current Anticoagulation Therapy
  • Pregnancy

研究组 & 干预措施

FlexHD

Active Comparator

Patients randomly assigned to receive FlexHD for breast reconstruction.

干预措施: FlexHD (Biological)

Alloderm

Active Comparator

Patients randomly assigned to receive Alloderm for breast reconstruction.

干预措施: Alloderm (Biological)

结局指标

主要结局

Wound Dehiscence

时间窗: One Year

time frame.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验