跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00997516
NCT00997516终止不适用

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

University of California, San Francisco2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 75 人开始时间: 2010年5月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
75
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pain After Surgery

研究概览

简要总结

Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation have made it possible to perform intra-abdominal operations entirely through a small incision that can be hidden within the umbilicus. The goal is to perform surgery with fewer incisions and no visible scars. Other potential benefits are faster recovery, less pain, and fewer wound complications. The term SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) is being used to describe such techniques, and many have touted SILS as a major breakthrough in minimally-invasive surgery, moving the field closer to surgery that is bloodless, incisionless, and painless. Despite the hype, prospective comparisons of SILS versus conventional laparoscopy are lacking. Results of SILS procedures have generally been limited to case reports and small case series that lack controls. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of SILS appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy to treat acute appendicitis. Primary end-points are operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, recovery time, and long-term cosmetic outcome. The investigators hypothesize SILS appendectomy is equivalent to laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, and recovery time while providing a better cosmetic outcome.

详细描述

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND METHODS Patient Enrollment: The study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis. At UCSF, such patients are first evaluated by a small group of general surgeons who provide emergency consultations. Once a decision to operate has been made on clinical grounds, the principal investigator (Dr. Carter) or his delegate will be contacted to approach the patient for enrollment and informed consent.

All patients will receive standard care which consists of preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics consisting of Zosyn, Ertapenem, or Cipro/Flagyl and intravenous fluids.

Surgeon Enrollment: All surgeons at UCSF who take call in the Emergency Department routinely perform conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surgeons wishing to participate in the trial will perform 5 proctored SILS appendectomies outside of the trial before enrolling patients. We chose the number 5 because one study showed that SILS operative times (a surrogate for procedural mastery) leveled off by the 5th case for surgeons already proficient in laparoscopy.

Randomization: After enrollment, patients will be assigned to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy versus SILS appendectomy in a 1:1 ratio by a computerized random number generator (http://www.random.org). Even-numbered patients will receive conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, odd-numbered will receive SILS appendectomy.

Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy technique: Patients are placed in the supine position and given a general anesthetic. An orogastric tube is placed. Sequential compression devices are placed on the legs. Unless the patient has just voided, a Foley catheter is placed in the bladder. The left arm is tucked and the abdomen shaved as necessary. The umbilical skin is anesthetized with 5mL of 0.25% marcaine. A 1.5cm vertical or transverse skin incision is made within the umbilical stalk, the fascia is retracted, and a 1.5cm vertical fascial incision made with a scalpel. A 12mm Hasson port is placed through the fascia and the abdomen insufflated to 15mmHg with carbon dioxide gas. Alternatively, a small nick in the fascia can be made, a Veress needle used to achieve pneumoperitoneum, and a 12mm VersSTEP port placed through an introducer sheath. Diagnostic laparoscopy is then performed, with inspection of the stomach, liver, gallbladder, colon, small intestines, and pelvis. If a diagnosis other than acute appendicitis is made (such as pelvic inflammatory disease, sigmoid diverticulitis, cecal diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, perforated duodenal ulcer, etc.), the patient is excluded from the study and treated appropriately. If the appendix looks normal and no other pathology is found in the abdomen, the patient may stay enrolled in the study if the surgeon decides to remove the appendix.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •1. Suspected acute appendicitis on clinical and radiographic (CT) grounds

排除标准

  • •Phlegmon, mass, peri-appendicecal abscess, or diffuse peritonitis
  • •Prior open laparotomy with incision through the umbilicus
  • •Body Mass Index > 35
  • •Age <18 years
  • •Mental illness, dementia, or inability to provide informed consent
  • •Chronic pain requiring daily medication (including opiate and NSAIDs)
  • •Alternative diagnosis found by diagnostic laparoscopy (post-randomization)

研究组 & 干预措施

SILS appendectomy

Experimental

The study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis.

干预措施: SILS appendectomy (Procedure)

Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

Active Comparator

The study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis.

干预措施: conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain After Surgery

时间窗: 12 hours post-surgery

Mean pain score during 12 hours post-surgery, assessed by the ward nurse as needed, but at least every 4 hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Patients were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the most severe pain imaginable and 0 being no pain at all.

次要结局

  • Operative Time(up to 6 hours)
  • Procedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Port(during surgery , up to 6 hours)
  • Time to Return to Work(30 days)
  • Visceral or Vascular Injury(during surgery, up to 6 hours)
  • Wound Infection(6 months)
  • Wound Seroma(6 months)
  • Readmission Within 30 Days.(30 days)
  • Length of Stay(up to 14 days)
  • Deep Space Infection(6 months)
  • Body Image Score at 6 Months(6 months)
  • Satisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验