跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00329888
NCT00329888Unknown不适用

Comparison of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation and Sphincterotomy for CBD Stones With Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering

National Taiwan University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2006年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Compare endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation vs. endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in:

  • when sphincterotomy is difficult (periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis)
  • when there is distal CBD tapering.

详细描述

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for treating bile duct stones:

  • easier and as effective. But...
  • a higher risk of pancreatitis.

Conditions including periampullary diverticulum, prior EST, Billroth-II anastomosis, or distal CBD tapering pose difficulty in EST and lithotripsy with increased risk of complications.

Whether EPBD or EST is superior in efficacy or safety under such circumstances is not clear.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Defined Population
时间视角
Other

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Choledocholithiasis with
  • Difficult sphincterotomy:periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis
  • or distal CBD tapering.

排除标准

  • Patients in whom no endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation or endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for lithotripsy

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Papillary Balloon Dilatation... | 临床试验