Interpretation of Uroflowmetry Samples from Pediatric Patients by Clinicians and Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, and Interpretation of the Samples by Artificial Intelligence

The study included uroflowmetry tests of children aged 4-17 years who were referred to our clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms. Uroflowmetry patterns were independently interpreted by three pediatric urology experts. Discrepancies in interpretations were jointly re-evaluated by the three observers, and a consensus was reached. Voiding volume, voiding duration, and urine flow rates at 0.5-second intervals were converted into numerical data for analysis. Eighty percent of the dataset was used as training data for machine learning, while there maining 20% was reserved for testing. A total of five different machine learning models were employed for classification: Decision Tree, Random Forest, CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The models that most accurately identified each uroflowmetry pattern were determined.