跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/04/018786
CTRI/2019/04/018786尚未招募4 期

Comparative study of efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of topical combination therapy with clindamycin 1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% versus adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in cases of mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris: A prospective, randomized, open label, parallel study

Government medical college Nagpur1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2019年4月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the efficacy of clindamycin 1% -benzoyl peroxide 2.5% with adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris by lesion counting.

研究概览

简要总结

Title - Comparative study of efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of topical combination therapy with clindamycin 1 %-benzoyl peroxide 2.5 % versus adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in cases of mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris patients: A prospective, randomized, open label, parallel study

Introduction - Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous units characterized by seborrhoea, formation of open and closed comedones, erythematous papules and pustules and in more severe cases nodules, deep pustules and pseudocysts. Acne vulgaris affects over 80% of teenagers, and persists beyond the age of 25 years in 3% of men and 12% of women. Prevalence of acne vulgaris is 56% in boys and 45% in girls between 14 to 16 years of age group. Facial acne results in impairment of self-image, self-esteem, clinical depression, social phobia and anxiety. Anxiety may be worsened if there is lack of response to acne treatment. For the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris, there are many topical drugs available like benzoyl peroxide, azelaic acid, antibiotics and retinoids, which can be used alone or in combination. After extensive search a published study comparing clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% versus adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% combination therapy in indian population could not be found. Hence this study is being conducted to compare the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of clindamycin-BPO versus adapalene-BPO combination therapy.

Methodology - The study will be randomized, open label, parallel arm, and prospective study  carried out in a tertiary care hospital of central India from January 2019 to August 2020. A total of 60 patients visiting skin OPD suffering from mild to moderate facial acne as diagnosed by dermatologist will be included into the study.Patients of mild to moderate acne vulgaris attending skin OPD will be interviewed by dermatologist. Subjects fulfilling inclusion criteria will be allocated to one of the two groups (group A and Group B) on the first day of examination. Group A will receive topical clindamycin 1% and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% combination therapy. They will be advised to apply benzoyl peroxide gel first and after 5 min clindamycin to be applied over it, once daily at bed time for 12 weeks. Group B will receive topical adapalene 0.01 % and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% combination therapy. A combination gel of adapalene-benzoyl peroxide will be applied, once daily for 12 weeks. Subject will be called at weeks 4, 8 and 12 for efficacy and safety assessments. Efficacy evaluation will be based on lesion counting. Total lesion count will be done on each follow up visit and will be divided as inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. The reduction in number of lesions if any will be noted and percentage reduction will be calculated and graded. Symptoms like erythema, dryness, burning and purities will be recoded on every visit. Assessment of cost effectiveness will also be done in this study. For cost effectiveness analysis, cost effectiveness ratio of both treatment groups will be calculated based on formula (cost effectiveness=cost/outcome) .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Other
盲法
Open Label

入排标准

年龄范围
12.00 Year(s) 至 35.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Subjects of either gender 2) Subjects of 12 to 35 years of age with mild to moderate (comedones, papules and few pustules) facial acne vulgaris having more than or equal to 2 and less than equal to 30 lesions(inflammatory and/or non inflammatory) lesions.

排除标准

  • Patients already on anti-acne medication in last one month 2) Patients having nodulocystic lesions, acne conglobata, acne fulminans, secondary acne 3) Patients unwilling to give written informed consent 4) Patients with known hypersensitivity to benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin or adapalene 5) Pregnant or lactating women.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the efficacy of clindamycin 1% -benzoyl peroxide 2.5% with adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris by lesion counting.

时间窗: 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks

次要结局

  • 1)To compare the safety of clindamycin 1% -benzoyl peroxide 2.5% with adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris by lesion counting by clinical examination on scale of 0 to 3.(2)To compare the cost effectiveness of clindamycin 1% -benzoyl peroxide 2.5% with adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris by lesion counting.)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验