跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05102877
NCT05102877已完成不适用

The Effect of Sensory Level Versus Motor Level Electrical Stimulation of Pharyngeal Muscles in Acute Stroke Patients With Dysphagia

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 31 人开始时间: 2018年9月19日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
31
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Dysphagia outcome Severity Scale

研究概览

简要总结

Dysphagia is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in stroke survivors. Electrical stimulation is often included as part of the treatment plan for dysphagia, and can be applied at a sensory or motor level intensity. However, evidence to support these different modes of stimulation is lacking. This study compared the effectiveness of sensory and motor level stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia.

详细描述

Objective: Dysphagia is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in stroke survivors. Electrical stimulation is often included as part of the treatment plan for dysphagia, and can be applied at a sensory or motor level intensity. However, evidence to support sensory versus motor stimulation is lacking. This study compares the effect of sensory and motor stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia.

Design: Randomized controlled trial

Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Participants: Participants (50-75 years of age) who had dysphagia caused by a stroke within 6 months prior to enrollment were included. Participants were excluded if they had a contraindication for electrical stimulation, previous stroke, psychiatric disorder, contraindications for MBS, or pre-stroke swallowing disorders.

Interventions: Each patient received ten, 45-minute anterior neck sensory or motor level electrical stimulation sessions in addition to standard speech therapy. Motor stimulation was administered as a stimulus intensity sufficient to produce muscle contractions. Sensory stimulation was defined as the threshold when the patient feels a tingling sensation on their skin (approximately 4-5mA).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Double blind

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •acute ischemic CVA within the first month and confirmed by MRI.
  • •Diagnosis of dysphagia will be obtained by bedside swallowing exam and MBS/FEES studies.

排除标准

  • •patients who have contraindications for electrical stimulation (malignancy, DVT/thrombophlebitis, hemorrhagic conditions, pregnancy, pacemaker or other electrical hardware)
  • •known premorbid swallowing disorders
  • •dementia or psychiatric disorder
  • •bilateral cerebral involvement
  • •contraindications for FEES/MBS (infectious disease such as HIV, HCV, HBV, nasal obstruction, decompensated heart disease, risk of bleeding such as active ulcers, allergy to contrast).

研究组 & 干预措施

Sensory level stimulation

Experimental

ten, 45-minute anterior neck sensory level electrical stimulation sessions in addition to traditional dysphagia therapy.

干预措施: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (Device)

Motor level stimulation

Experimental

ten, 45-minute anterior neck sensory level electrical stimulation sessions in addition to traditional dysphagia therapy.

干预措施: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Dysphagia outcome Severity Scale

时间窗: up to 2 months

seven-point functional outcome scale designed to assess dysphagia severity on the MBSS, lowest score = 1; highest = 7.

Change in Swallow Functional Assessment Measure

时间窗: up to 2 months

7 point swallow scale the Functional oral intake scale (FOIS) lowest score = 1; highest = 7.

次要结局

  • Change in Swal-Qol(up to 3 months)
  • Change in PenAsp(up to 2 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Emily Rosario

Director of Research

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Sensory Versus Motor Level Neuromuscular Electrical... | 临床试验