Training With or Without Upper Body Restraint During Reaching in Individuals Post Stroke
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 24
- 主要终点
- WMFT
研究概览
简要总结
After 4 weeks of training the hypothesis that the more natural training program would yield greater functional changes was proven correct.
详细描述
Analysis indicated that both methods improved reaching without trunk use Reaching performance scale (RPS), but the trunk -stabilized group led to more significant changes. Training under less restrictive conditions associated with Task-Related Training (TRT) (auditory feedback from trunk sensor) as compared to stabilized TRT, led to improved functional and impairment measure scores (WMFT, FM and shoulder flexion). Conclusion: Fading feedback with both training methods, during extended TRT reaching/grasping practice generally led to some improvements. However, as demonstrated by impairment and functional outcome measures, using TRT with an auditory feedback signals is a more effective approach than forcing the stabilization of the trunk during rehabilitation of the upper-limb.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Individuals all scored between 20 and 44 on the Upper-Arm subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM- Poole & Whitney, 1988) and demonstrated some trunk movement during the pretest reaching performance scale measures (RPS, Levin 2006)
排除标准
- •Individuals were referred if they had no receptive aphasia, apraxia or other cognitive deficits.
研究组 & 干预措施
1
stabilization training group
干预措施: stabilization training (Behavioral)
2
auditory response training group
干预措施: auditory training group (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
WMFT
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- FM and shoulder flexion(1 year)
