跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04254822
NCT04254822Unknown不适用

Hepatic Vein Pressure Gradient(HVPG)-Guided Therapy vs Carvedilol Plus Endotherapy for the Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Air Force Military Medical University, China1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 220 人开始时间: 2020年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
220
试验地点
1
主要终点
Cumulative incidence of esophageal variceal rebleeding

研究概览

简要总结

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of cirrhosis, associated with a hospital mortality rate of 10%-20%. Surviving patients are at high risk for recurrent hemorrhage. For these reasons, management should be directed at its prevention. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EBL) in combination with non-selective β-blocker (NSBB) therapy is the recommended first line therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) is the most effective method to prevent rebleeding, however, it is burdened with increased hepatic encephalopathy and deterioration of liver function in patients with advanced cirrhosis. So TIPS placement forms an alternative if first line therapy fails.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently the best available method to evaluate the presence and severity of portal hypertension. Patients who experience a reduction in HVPG of ≥20% or to <12mmHg in response to drug therapy are defined as 'responders'. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are HVPG responders. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than drug therapy. This suggests that pharmacological therapy is the cornerstone of combination therapy. Adding EBL may not be the optimal approach to improve the outcome of HVPG nonresponders and HVPG non-responders are a special high-risk population that may benefit from a more aggressive approach, such as an early decision for TIPS. It recently was shown that TIPS placement within 72 hours after acute bleeding not only prevented recurrent bleeding but also improved survival. These raise the question of whether ligation together with NSBB should remain the first choice for elective secondary prophylaxis.

Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare whether HVPG-guided therapy is superior to standard combination therapy for the prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
  • History of esophageal variceal bleeding confirmed by endoscopy
  • Time interval between index bleeding and randomization > 5 days.
  • Child-Pugh score < 12,MELD score<19

排除标准

  • Clinical manifestation of active bleeding
  • Gastric variceal bleeding: GOV2,IGV1 or IGV2
  • Degree of main portal vein thrombosis > 50%
  • Refractory ascites
  • Contraindications of TIPS
  • Contraindications of NSBB
  • Budd-Chiari Syndrome
  • Malignancy tumor
  • Uncontrolled infections
  • History of portal-systemic shunt surgery
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
  • Poor incompliance

研究组 & 干预措施

HVPG-guided therapy

Experimental

HVPG will be determined before randomization. In this arm, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) receive carvedilol whereas nonresponders receive TIPS.

干预措施: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (Procedure)

HVPG-guided therapy

Experimental

HVPG will be determined before randomization. In this arm, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) receive carvedilol whereas nonresponders receive TIPS.

干预措施: Carvedilol (Drug)

Standard therapy

Active Comparator

In this group, both responders and nonresponders will receive combination therapy of carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation as first-line therapy. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS will considered.

干预措施: Carvedilol (Drug)

Standard therapy

Active Comparator

In this group, both responders and nonresponders will receive combination therapy of carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation as first-line therapy. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS will considered.

干预措施: Endoscopic variceal ligation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Cumulative incidence of esophageal variceal rebleeding

时间窗: 12 months

Source of variceal rebleeding will be determined by endoscopy.

次要结局

  • Cumulative incidence of variceal rebleeding related death(12 months)
  • Cumulative incidence of patients with further decompensation(12 months)
  • Cumulative incidence of patients with ascites(12 months)
  • Cumulative incidence of patients with hepatic encephalopathy(12 months)
  • Cumulative incidence of all cause mortality(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Air Force Military Medical University, China
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tie Jun

Primary investigator

Air Force Military Medical University, China

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验