跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04452331
NCT04452331已完成不适用

An Assessment of Open Access Audio of the Clinical Encounter on Veterans and Their Care

VA Office of Research and Development4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,553 人开始时间: 2021年10月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,553
试验地点
4
主要终点
Blood Pressure

研究概览

简要总结

The medical encounter can be overwhelming in term of the amount of information discussed, its technical nature, and the anxiety it can generate. Easy access to a secure audio recording from any internet enabled device is an available low cost technology that allows patients to "revisit the visit" either alone or sharing with caretakers and family. It has been introduced and tested outside the VA with evidence that it increases patient recall and understanding and may even improve physician performance. Little is known, however, about whether and to what extent these effects lead to better outcomes, such as improved treatment plan adherence and chronic disease self-management. This study is a randomized controlled trial designed ascertain whether easy access to audio recordings of the medical visit improves patients perception that they understand and can manage their own care, and leads to a variety of improved outcomes, such as better blood pressure and diabetes control, and fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations.

详细描述

The study aims to assess (1) the impact of an open access audio (OAA) program on two behaviors (patient activation, treatment plan adherence), and two chronic condition measures (glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure); (2) the impact of open access audio on provider communication and on their attention to patient contextual factors (i.e. individual Veteran's needs and circumstances relevant to planning effective care); and (3) patient, provider, and leadership perceptions of the extent to which the program is safe, not burdensome, and worthwhile at both the start and at two years into the program. A secondary analysis will descriptively measure the effect size of OAA on ED visits and hospital admissions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Arm 1 is the intervention, with both provider and patient aware of the recording. It is designed to represent how OAA would be utilized in actual practice. In Arm 2 all parties are also aware of the audio recording, but this time neither gets access to the audio after the visit (although the research team does). Arm 2 is a control for isolating the effect of patient access after the visit to the audio in Arm 1. Both patient and physician are blind to whether they are in Arm 1 or 2 until after the visit. Arm 3 is a second kind of control, as the audio is again not shared with the patient. In this arm, however, the patient conceals the audio recorder, so that the provider is unaware they are being audio recorded until after the visit.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients with scheduled appointments at the participating sites: primary care and diabetes clinics at Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Blood Pressure

时间窗: 6 months

This outcome tests the hypothesis that blood pressure control improves in patients with blood pressure \> 140/90 when they have access to an audio recording of their visit with their provider regarding blood pressure management compared to those who do not. An improvement in blood pressure is defined as a reduction of 10 or more mmHg in either the systolic or diastolic blood pressure.

Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HgB A1c)

时间窗: 4-6 months

This outcome tests the hypothesis that HgB A1c improves in patients with Hgb A1c \> 7 when they have access to an audio recording of their discussion with their provider regarding diabetes management compared to when they do no. An improvement is defined as a decrease of 1% or more.

Return Visit Adherence (RVA)

时间窗: From index visit to end of study data collection, an average of 512 days

This outcome tests the hypothesis that return visit adherence (RVA) improves in patients with non-adherence when they have access to an audio recording of their discussion with their provider. The outcome is the predicted proportion of visits scheduled between the time of the index visit and the end of the study that the patient attends (adjusted for clinic). For example, a value of 0.73 means that, adjusted for clinic, a patient in the given arm attends 73% of visits scheduled between their index visit and the study end date.

Patient Activation Measure (PAM)

时间窗: 2 weeks

This outcome tests the hypothesis that patient activation is higher in patients when they have access to an audio recording of their visit with their provider compared to when they do not. Patients are called by phone post visit to answer PAM 10, a 10 item questionnaire with a 5 point Likert response that scores their perceived knowledge, skills, and confident in their capacity to follow their treatment plan with scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates higher patient activation.

Prescription Refill Rate (Probability That Proportion Days Covered >= 80%)

时间窗: 6 months

This outcome tests the hypothesis that prescription adherence improves in patients when they have access to an audio recording of their discussion with their provider compared to when they do not. Adherence is defined as having at least 80% proportion days covered (PDF). PDC is the total number of days covered by refills in a measurement period divided by the number of days between the first fill and the end of the measurement period. Non-adherence is defined as a PDC\<80% during the 6 months prior to the audio recorded visit. The outcome is the probability that a patient's PDC is at least 80% following their participation, adjusted for clinic.

SEGUE Framework for Evaluating and Scoring Communication Behavior.

时间窗: Recorded visit

This outcome tests the hypothesis that physicians communicate more effectively when they are aware the visit is being recorded for the patient to when they are not. Communication behavior will be rated off the audio recording by a research assistant utilizing the SEGUE checklist. Outcome measure is total proportion achieved score on 32 item SEGUE instrument, ranging from 0 to 1 with a higher score indicating more effective communication.

Contextualization of Care

时间窗: Recorded visit

This outcome tests the hypothesis that physicians are more likely to contextualize the care plan when they are aware the visit is being recorded for the patient to when they are not. Contextualization of care will be rated off of the audio recording by a research assistant trained in Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C Coding), which determines each contextual red flag audible during the visit, whether the physician probed each red flag, each contextual factor identified by physician probe, and whether the physician addressed the contextual factor in the care plan. Outcome measure is the predicted probability of an encounter in which the care plan was contextualized (either the physician found no contextual factors present after investigating red flags, or physician found a contextual factor(s) and incorporated them into the plan), adjusted for clinic.

次要结局

  • Emergency Department Utilization(6 months)
  • Hospital Admission Rate(6 months)
  • Glycated Hemoglobin (Access vs. Non-access)(Six month)
  • ED Visit Rate (Access vs. Non-access)(Six month)
  • Return Visit Attendance (Access vs. Non-access)(From recorded visit to study end date, an average of 512 days)
  • Blood Pressure (Access vs. Non-access)(Six month)
  • Probability That Proportion of Days Covered by Prescription >= 80% (Access vs. Non-access)(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Assessing Open Access Audio | 临床试验