跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07067866
NCT07067866招募中3 期

Weaning Approaches for Vasopressin in Sepsis - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Titrated Versus Abrupt Discontinuation During Stabilization of Septic Shock - WAVES Trial

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 82 人开始时间: 2025年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
招募中
入组人数
82
试验地点
2
主要终点
Hypotension within the first 24 hours

研究概览

简要总结

In this study, we aim to evaluate the incidence of hypotension during vasopressin weaning by comparing two methods - titrated reduction versus abrupt withdrawal - through the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.

详细描述

Catecholamine infusions are usually tapered gradually in a titrated manner. However, little is known about how to manage adjunctive therapies such as vasopressin. While catecholamines have a short half-life (2-3 minutes), vasopressin's half-life ranges from 10 to 20 minutes. Although endogenous vasopressin levels are depleted in the early phase of shock, they are restored during recovery. Given its pharmacokinetic profile and the endogenous dynamics across different phases of shock, the optimal approach to vasopressin withdrawal - whether titrated or abrupt - remains unclear.

In 2021, a study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin discontinuation. This was a retrospective observational study including 1,318 patients. Using ICU length of stay as the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed between groups (abrupt discontinuation: 7.9 days; gradual discontinuation: 7.3 days; p = 0.6). Similarly, there was no difference in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 39.7%; gradual: 41.7%; p = 0.53). However, when stratifying patients based on whether catecholamine infusions were still ongoing at the time of vasopressin discontinuation, the results reversed in terms of ICU stay (abrupt: 9.2 days; gradual: 7.6 days), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). In 2023, another retrospective observational study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin withdrawal, including 74 patients. No difference was found in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 57.1%; gradual: 52.3%; p = 0.68), nor in ICU length of stay. It is important to note, however, that in this cohort only patients who had already discontinued catecholamines prior to vasopressin withdrawal were included.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age over 18 years
  • Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
  • Patients with vasopressor dependent sepsis
  • Receiving combined norepinephrine and vasopressin therapy

排除标准

  • Withdrawal/reduction of vasopressin related to a plan of treatment limitation or palliative care
  • Withdrawal/reduction of vasopressin associated with the initiation of adrenaline or any other vasopressor

结局指标

主要结局

Hypotension within the first 24 hours

时间窗: 24 hours

Incidence of hypotension with clinical repercussions within the first 24 hours after titrated reduction or abrupt withdrawal of vasopressin. Definition of hypotension with clinical repercussions: mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg, leading to: * administration of crystalloid/colloid bolus and/or * increase in norepinephrine dose and/or * reinitiation or increase in vasopressin dose.

次要结局

  • Hypotension stratified according to vasopressin duration(24 hours)
  • Hypotension within the first hour(First hour)
  • Vasopressor-free days(7 days)
  • Vasopressin-free days(7 days)
  • Renal replacement therapy(7 days)
  • Cardiac arrhythmias(7 days)
  • ICU-free days(28 days)
  • Ischemic events(28 days)
  • All-cause mortality(28 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Cássio Mallmann

Critical Care Physician, MS

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验