Induction of Labor (IOL) Using Cervical Double-balloon (Cook Catheter) in Outpatient Versus Inpatient Setting (COOK Study): a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 358
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Fetal wellbeing
研究概览
简要总结
Why was this study done? About 20-30% of pregnancies involve labor being started artificially, known as induction. One way to do this is with a balloon catheter placed in the cervix, which helps prepare the body for labor. This mechanical method works just as well as using medication but may be safer for the baby, as it reduces the chances of the womb contracting too much (which can cause stress to the baby). Because it's safe and simple, this method could possibly be done at home instead of in the hospital.
What was the aim of the study? The researchers wanted to compare how safe and effective this balloon method is when used at home (outpatient) versus in the hospital (inpatient). They also wanted to know how satisfied women were with each approach.
How was the study done? The study took place at four hospitals in Belgium between 2017 and 2023. It included women with healthy low risk pregnancies who were scheduled for induction for non-urgent reasons, such as being past their due date, having a large baby, or by personal choice after 38 weeks of pregnancy.
The women were randomly placed into two groups:
Outpatient setting: going home after balloon placement.
Inpatient setting: staying in the hospital after balloon placement<
The main thing researchers measured was whether the baby's heart rate pattern (checked by CTG monitoring) was abnormal after 12 hours. They also looked at how the baby was born (vaginal birth or C-section), how long labor took, whether additional medicine was needed, pain management, and how satisfied the mothers were with the process.
详细描述
Study Design and Approval
This was a randomised controlled trial - a scientific study designed to compare two groups as fairly as possible. It took place in four hospitals in Belgium:
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL), Genk
AZ Sint-Lucas, Brugge
Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •women >18 years of age with singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation and a unfavourable cervix requiring priming (Bishop Score ≤ 6) that needed an IOL for low risk indications: post-term, macrosomia, patient's preference (> 38 0/7 weeks of gestational age).
排除标准
- •: multiple pregnancies, preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), foetal growth restriction (FGR), placenta-accreta spectrum (PAS), previous C-Section(s), non-cephalic presentation, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, living at >60 minutes from the hospital, any other maternal or foetal morbidity, any other contraindication to vaginal birth.
研究组 & 干预措施
Inpatient
Patient in this arm were randomized to stay in the hospital during cervical balloon ripening
干预措施: cervical balloon catheter (Device)
Outpatient
Patients in this arm were randomized to ambulant home setting during cervical ripening
干预措施: cervical balloon catheter (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Fetal wellbeing
时间窗: 12 hours
The primary outcome was foetal wellbeing assessed by cardiotocography (CTG) immediately after balloon insertion and balloon removal (12 hours after insertion). The CTG could be normal or not normal. The CTG was reported as not normal in case of a baseline rise, decelerations (even if they were not repeated decelerations) or decreased variability. The second CTG assessment was performed earlier in case of vaginal bleeding, fluid loss, onset of regular painful contractions, balloon expulsion or in any other case judged clinically relevant by the obstetrician
次要结局
未报告次要终点
