跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07405034
NCT07405034尚未招募不适用

Artificial Intelligence Driven Exercises Versus Conventional Exercises Therapy for Patellofemoral

Cairo University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2026年2月26日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to investigate and compare the effect of AI driven exercises program versus the conventional exercises therapy program on pain, function and dynamic knee valgus angle in treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.This study is randomized controlled trial and includes 40 participants .These participants divided into 2 groups (A, B), each group will be assessed with 3 measurments (vas ,dynamic knee valgus, Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale) and each group will receive difeerent treatments.

The individuals in group A(study group) will preceive AI driven exercises program while the individual in group B will receive conventional exercises therapy program. Participants in the both groups are prescribed a 6-week comprehensive exercises program (3 sessions per week) day after day and assessment procedure will be performed pre and post treatmeant .

详细描述

PURPOSE : This study aims to investigate and compare the effect of AI driven exercises program versus the conventional exercises therapy program on pain, function and dynamic knee valgus angle in treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND:

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is one of the most common knee problems that disturb function and daily activities (Menek et al .,2025). Symptoms of PFPS can develop either slowly or abruptly, and pain tends to worsen with activities such as squatting, prolonged sitting, stair climbing, jumping, or running (Menek et al .,2025). PFPS affects approximately 25% of physically active individuals (Smith et al .,2018).

Core training significantly improves pain and functional limitations in patients with PFP and improves lower extremity motor performance to some extent (Y. Wang et al., 2024). These results draw more attention to the importance of the core muscle performance for both prevention and rehabilitation of the knee injuries

HYPOTHESES:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

All participants will randomized via random generator (www.randomization.com). All patients will be blinded to group allocation by ensuring that they will be unaware of the exercises performed by the other group. To maintain the blinding, the intervention sessions will be delivered separately to members of each treatment group.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Their ages range from 18- 40 years old, including both genders (male & female).
  • Their BMI will be ≤ 29 kg/m
  • A traumatic knee pain persisting for at least three months.

排除标准

  • Any congenital deformity of the lower limb,
  • Any recent injuries and surgeries
  • severe foot deformities such as hallux valgus and claw toe
  • Neuromuscular and neurological disorders.- history of patellofemoral dislocation, subluxation .

研究组 & 干预措施

( AI driven EX for study group )

Active Comparator

The individuals in group A(study group) will preceive AI driven exercises program while the individual in group B will receive conventional exercises therapy program. Participants in the both groups are prescribed a 6-week comprehensive exercises program (3 sessions per week) day after day and assessment procedure will be performed pre and post treatmeant

干预措施: Ai driven EX (Other)

conventional ex group

Other

The individual in group B will receive conventional exercises therapy program. Participants in the both groups are prescribed a 6-week comprehensive exercises program (3 sessions per week) day after day and assessment procedure will be performed pre and post treatmeant .

干预措施: conventional exercises therapy program (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale

时间窗: up to 6 weeks

a 13-item scale assessing knee functionality. The total Kujala score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better performance. Additionally, The Kujala score is known for its reliability and validity in assessing patients with frozen PFPS

次要结局

  • visual analog scale(up to 6 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alaa hamdi elsaid rizk

assistant lecturer

Cairo University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验