Effect of Retro Walking Versus Isometric Multi-angular Exercises on Pain and Functional Performance in Knee Osteoarthritis in Geriatric Population: A Randomized Controlled Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Pain intensity
研究概览
简要总结
Osteoarthritis is a leading musculoskeletal cause of disability in elderly persons all over the world and a major cause of physical limitations and reduced quality of life (1). Its onset is around 40 years of age and it is estimated that over 80% of people over 55 have evidence of radiographic changes in the knee due to osteoarthritis. It has been estimated that the incidence has increased by the increase in life expectancy and it has been identified as a frequent cause for health services demand in patients over 65(2).
The common clinical manifestations of knee OA include pain, stiffness, joint enlargement, crepitus, muscle weakness, deformity, impaired proprioception, reduced joint motion, and disability(3).
Patients with knee Osteoarthritis seems to develop their own gait pattern and try to unload the affected structures during gait. More over patients with less severe knee osteoarthritis develop a gait pattern that differs from patients with severe osteoarthritis and control group of patients (4).
Isometric exercises are types of strength training in which the joint angle and muscle length do not change during contraction, and therefore this approach can be advantageous in the early stages of knee rehabilitation in cases where the range of motion is restricted due to pain (13). No physical work is performed during isometric exercise. Intensity and duration combination reflects the energy consumption of an isometric contraction (14). In addition, muscle strength increases in isometric exercise are specific to the angle applied. It was also concluded that isometric exercise performed at different angles should be especially considered as an alternative strength training since it induces the most noticeable and fastest increase in muscle moment (15). A study was conducted to investigate the effects of isometric quadriceps exercise on muscle strength, pain, and function in knee osteoarthritis, it was concluded that isometric quadriceps exercise program showed beneficial effects on quadriceps muscle strength, pain, and functional disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (16).
Another study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Isometric exercise and counseling on level of pain among patients with Knee osteoarthritis, the authors concluded that Isometric exercise and counseling program has significantly reduced pain, stiffness and improved physical function and the authors recommended that Isometric exercise and counselling should be adopted as a routine care in the hospitals treating patients with knee osteoarthritis (17) Thus, we hypothesized that a less intensive walking program such as retro walking program could provide an additional benefit more than those experienced by forward walking program in the previous studies. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to compare the effect of retro walking versus isometric multiangular exercises group on knee pain and function in geriatric people.
Materials and Methods
This randomized controlled experimental trial was carried out at the outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Delta University for science and technology from June 2023 to November 2023. The aims of the study and the study protocol were explained for each patient before participation in the study. All patients signed an approved informed consent form for participation in this study. Before starting the treatment program, a complete history and physical examination will be taken for all patients.
Subjects:
Sixty male and female geriatric patients had chronic knee osteoarthritis were chosen the outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Delta University for science and technology. In each case, the diagnosis of knee OA was based on the criteria specified by the American College of Rheumatology.
We recorded the height, weight, and medical history, and lower extremity dominance, level of education, occupation and duration of complaints of each patient. All were evaluated at the beginning of the treatment (week 0), at the endpoint of the treatment (week 4)
详细描述
Introduction:
Osteoarthritis is a leading musculoskeletal cause of disability in elderly persons all over the world and a major cause of physical limitations and reduced quality of life (1). Its onset is around 40 years of age and it is estimated that over 80% of people over 55 have evidence of radiographic changes in the knee due to osteoarthritis. It has been estimated that the incidence has increased by the increase in life expectancy and it has been identified as a frequent cause for health services demand in patients over 65(2).
The common clinical manifestations of knee OA include pain, stiffness, joint enlargement, crepitus, muscle weakness, deformity, impaired proprioception, reduced joint motion, and disability(3).
Patients with knee Osteoarthritis seems to develop their own gait pattern and try to unload the affected structures during gait. More over patients with less severe knee osteoarthritis develop a gait pattern that differs from patients with severe osteoarthritis and control group of patients (4).
Biomechanical studies indicated individual with O.A. knee walk more slowly, with less knee excursion, increased adduction moment and with more joint stiffness. These secondary compensatory gait adaptation in O.A. knee patients helps in reducing pain by decreasing ground reaction loading on knee (5). This prolonged usage of secondary gait compensation creates greater imbalances of muscle, progressively reduces muscle strength, endurance, flexibility and later ending to deformity (6).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
盲法说明
Sixty male and female geriatric patients had chronic knee osteoarthritis were chosen the outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Delta University for science and technology. education, occupation and duration of complaints of each patient. All were evaluated at the beginning of the treatment (week 0), at the endpoint of the treatment (week 4).
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Male and female geriatric participants clinically diagnosed with osteoarthritis of knee by Orthopaedician; - Age more than 60 years
- •Participants having grade 2 and grade 3 as per Kellgren and Lawrence scale
- •The participants fulfilling clinical criteria listed by the American College of Rheumatology: knee pain and any three out of six: age > 50 years, morning stiffness lasting < 30 minutes, crepitus on active motion, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, no warmth on touch
- •Participants having knee pain for more than 6 weeks; Willingness to participate in the study.
排除标准
- •Participants with inflammatory joint disease of lower extremity, neurological disorder (motor and sensory loss), cardiac or metabolic condition
- •Participants involved in any form of physical exercise for lower extremity for at least 3 months
- •Participants taking pharmacological interventions
- •Participants taking an intra- articular injection for knee since last 6 months
- •Participants with history of recent surgery to hip, knee, ankle joint involving ligament, meniscus;
- •Participants with balance problem
结局指标
主要结局
Pain intensity
时间窗: pre the intervention and immediately after the intervention
It was examined by using a 10 cm long visual analogue scale (VAS) during both rest and activity (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain).
Functional assessment:
时间窗: pre the intervention and immediately after the intervention
It was assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), which consists of 24 questions, specifically 5 for pain, 2 for joint stiffness and 17 related to functional status, each being scored from 1 to 5 On this metric, a high score suggests bad health, while relatively healthy subjects will have a low score. The assessments were grouped into four classifications, specifically WOMAC A for pain, WOMAC B for joint stiffness, WOMAC C for function status, and WOMAC-Total for the total score.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
