跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07704593
NCT07704593尚未招募不适用

The Preliminary Effectiveness of Personalized Physiotherapy Grounded in a Process-Based Therapy Framework in People With (Sub)Acute Neck Pain: a Protocol for a Mixed-methods Single-case Research Design

University of Applied Sciences Utrecht9 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 11 人开始时间: 2026年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
11
试验地点
9
主要终点
Pain intensity

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if personalized physiotherapy can lower neck pain in adults with recent (sub)acute neck pain who have a higher chance of the pain becoming long-lasting. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does personalized physiotherapy lower pain compared to standard physiotherapy? Does personalized physiotherapy improve daily activities, quality of life, and pain interference compared to standard physiotherapy? Do physiotherapists deliver the personalized treatment as intended?

Researchers will compare each participant's own results during a standard care period to their results during a personalized care period, to see if the personalized approach works better than standard care.

Participants will:

Receive standard physiotherapy care for 3 weeks Then receive personalized physiotherapy, tailored to their individual needs, for several weeks (until their treatment goals are achieved) Answer short questions about their pain and daily functioning three times a week Take part in an interview about their experiences every 3 weeks

详细描述

This study employs a replicated mixed-methods single-case experimental design (MMSCR) with a convergent, parallel approach, in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected concurrently and subsequently integrated. The protocol was developed in accordance with the Single-Case Reporting Guideline in Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 and the Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS) guidelines.

Rationale Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a multifactorial condition in which physical, behavioral, cognitive, and contextual processes vary between patients, change over time, and continuously interact. A standardized treatment approach is therefore inherently limited. Personalized physiotherapy grounded in a Process-Based Therapy (PBT) framework aims to address this by continuously identifying which modifiable biopsychosocial processes are most relevant for an individual patient at a given moment, and selecting interventions that most efficiently target those processes. To make this approach feasible in daily primary care practice, a treatment protocol was developed together with a data-driven Clinical Compass, consisting of clinical indicators of modifiable biopsychosocial processes. This study is designed to obtain a first estimate of the preliminary effectiveness of this approach and to examine the fidelity with which it is delivered, prior to larger-scale evaluation.

Study design The quantitative component follows a nonconcurrent AB single-case experimental design (SCED) with repeated measurement, replicated systematically across 11 participants (11 SCEDs). Each participant undergoes a predetermined phase sequence: a baseline phase (A) followed by an intervention phase (B). The baseline phase spans three weeks with a minimum of nine measurement points; the intervention phase lasts a minimum of two weeks with a minimum of six measurement points, with actual duration depending on individual treatment progress. The number of measurements per phase was determined based on the discriminative power required to detect changes in outcome trajectories. Replication across 11 cases is achieved by delivering the intervention through different physiotherapists working in different geographic regions, all applying identical eligibility criteria.

Researcher blinding is not applied, as outcome measures are self-reported and the researcher is not involved in intervention delivery.

Study setting and therapist training The study will be conducted in nine primary care physiotherapy practices participating in the project consortium, purposefully selected to ensure variation in demographic characteristics, specialization, and practice size. Prior to study commencement, all participating physiotherapists complete a structured training programme targeting knowledge transfer, skill development, professional identity, and behavior change in practice. The programme consists of four sequential components: preparatory video modules with personal reflection, an online interactive case-based session, a live training session including role-play with a trained actor and guided reflection, and structured peer supervision sessions during the active treatment phase of the study to support implementation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

Only the raters evaluating the audio recordings for intervention fidelity are blinded to the phase

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 years or older
  • New episode of neck pain with duration ≤12 weeks since onset
  • Neck pain located in the region shown in Figure 2
  • ≥19% risk of developing chronic complaints, as determined using a prognostic model
  • If a previous episode of neck pain occurred, the current episode must have been preceded by ≥3 consecutive months without persistent pain (defined as absence of pain associated with activity limitation or healthcare consultation)

排除标准

  • Prior neck surgery
  • Cervical radiculopathy as identified using the Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test (ULNT1)
  • Widespread primary pain according to ICD-11 criteria (diffuse musculoskeletal pain in ≥4 of 5 body regions, across ≥3 body quadrants, involving the axial skeleton)
  • Pain of non-musculoskeletal origin
  • Insufficient proficiency in Dutch to read or understand study instructions

结局指标

主要结局

Pain intensity

时间窗: Outcomes will be assessed three times per week, from baseline (Week 1) through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Patients will answer the question: "How intense was your pain on average over the past two days?" Responses range from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain. The NPRS is a validated instrument recommended in the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF) Neck Pain Guideline for evaluating pain intensity. The Minimal Important Change (MIC) for patients with neck pain is 2.5 points.

次要结局

  • Sleep(Baseline (Week 1), start of intervention phase (Week 4), and post-intervention (study completion, an average of 7 weeks))
  • Patient-specific activity limitations(Outcomes will be assessed three times per week, from baseline (Week 1) through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.)
  • Pain coping(Baseline (Week 1), start of intervention phase (Week 4), and post-intervention (study completion, an average of 7 weeks))
  • Quality of Life as Measured by EQ-5D-VAS(Outcomes will be assessed three times per week, from baseline (Week 1) through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.)
  • Pain interference(Outcomes will be assessed three times per week, from baseline (Week 1) through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.)
  • Perceived effect(Outcomes will be assessed three times per week, from baseline (Week 1) through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.)
  • Fear of movement(Baseline (Week 1), start of intervention phase (Week 4), and post-intervention (study completion, an average of 7 weeks))
  • Hypervigilance(Baseline (Week 1), start of intervention phase (Week 4), and post-intervention (study completion, an average of 7 weeks))
  • Pain catastrophizing(Baseline (Week 1), start of intervention phase (Week 4), and post-intervention (study completion, an average of 7 weeks))

研究者

发起方
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sophie Konings

Principal Investigator

University of Applied Sciences Utrecht

研究点 (9)

Loading locations...

相似试验