A MULTI-CENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TWO ACNE CREAMS IN SUBJECTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ACNE VULGARIS
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 66
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Treatment Tolerability Assessment: Erythema
研究概览
简要总结
This research is being done to find out the safety and efficacy of two acne creams, Effaclar and Benzaclin when used twice daily with a topical retinoid. Effaclar and Benzaclin are FDA approved for the treatment of acne.
详细描述
There are many products on the market to treat facial acne. The medication that this study will be evaluating, Benzaclin and Retin-A have been approved by the FDA and is available by prescription, Effaclar is an over the counter product. This study will hopefully recognize a treatment combination that is effective in reducing acne vulgaris in adults 18-50.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 50 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •males and females ages 18-50, mild to moderate acne vulgaris with > or equal to 15 inflammatory lesions, > or equal to 20 non-inflammatory lesions, avoid excessive sun exposure or tanning beds throughout the study
排除标准
- •Participants who have another skin condition that will interfere with lesion counting or assessments
研究组 & 干预措施
BenzaClin
Evaluate and compare tolerance and efficacy of two anti-acne creams, Effaclar and Benzaclin over a twelve week period.Inclusion- males and females ages 18-50, mild to moderate acne vulgaris with > or equal to 15 inflammatory lesions, > or equal to 20 non-inflammatory lesions, avoid excessive sun exposure or tanning beds throughout the study, . Exclusion- Participants who have another skin condition that will interfere with lesion counting or assessments
干预措施: BenzaClin (Drug)
effaclar
Evaluate and compare tolerance and efficacy of two anti-acne creams, Effaclar and Benzaclin over a twelve week period.Inclusion- males and females ages 18-50, mild to moderate acne vulgaris with > or equal to 15 inflammatory lesions, > or equal to 20 non-inflammatory lesions, avoid excessive sun exposure or tanning beds throughout the study, . Exclusion- Participants who have another skin condition that will interfere with lesion counting or assessments
干预措施: Effaclar (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Treatment Tolerability Assessment: Erythema
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for Erythema on a 4-point ordinal scale where 0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Inflammatory Lesions
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial inflammatory lesions and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Treatment Tolerability Assessment: Edema
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for Edema on a 4-point ordinal scale where 0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Treatment Tolerability Assessment: Dryness
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for Dryness on a 4-point ordinal scale where 0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Treatment Tolerability Assessment: Peeling
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for Peeling on a 4-point ordinal scale where 0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Skin Tone (Clarity)
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for skin tone (clarity) on a 10-point visual analog scale with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Skin Smoothness
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for skin smoothness on a 10-point visual analog scale with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Skin Brightness
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for skin brightness on a 10-point visual analog scale with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Appearance of Pores
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for the appearance of pores on a 10-point visual analog scale,with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Overall Appearance
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for overall appearance on a 10-point visual analog scale with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Skin Assessment: Global Acne Assessment
时间窗: 16 weeks
The facial skin was assessed for global acne assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale with 0 indicating a favorable rating and 9 indicating an unfavorable rating. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Open Comedones
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial open comedomes and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Closed Comedones
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial closed comedomes and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Papules
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial open comedomes and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Pustules
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial pustules and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Noninflammatory Lesions
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for facial noninflammatory lesions and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Facial Lesion Counts: Total Lesion
时间窗: 16 weeks
Participants were assessed for all facial lesions and the total number present was recorded. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Subjective Tolerability of Irritation Assessment (Participant Assessed): Stinging
时间窗: 16 weeks
Irritation stinging was subjectively reported by participants and captured on a 4 point ordinal scale (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe). Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Subjective Tolerability of Irritation Assessment (Participant Assessed): Tingling
时间窗: 16 weeks
Irritation tingling was subjectively reported by participants and captured on a 4 point ordinal scale (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe). Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Subjective Tolerability of Irritation Assessment (Participant Assessed): Itching
时间窗: 16 weeks
Irritation itching was subjectively reported by participants and captured on a 4 point ordinal scale (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe). Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
Subjective Tolerability of Irritation Assessment (Participant Assessed): Burning
时间窗: 16 weeks
Irritation burning was subjectively reported by participants and captured on a 4 point ordinal scale (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe). Assessments were made at baseline and weeks, 2, 4, 8, and 12, with the regression phase assessment at week 16.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Amy Longenecker
RN, CCRC
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center