跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06144047
NCT06144047招募中不适用

Real World Testing and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Subcutaneous EEG (REAL-ASE)

King's College London1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 33 人开始时间: 2023年7月18日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
33
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid data review of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution

研究概览

简要总结

The study will investigate whether a novel method to accurately count epileptic seizures, using a CE-marked minimally-invasive ultra long-term subcutaneous electroencephalography (EEG) solution (UNEEG™ SubQ , including 24/7 EEG SubQ), (i) is more accurate than a participant-reported seizure diary; (ii) is feasible and acceptable to participants and clinicians; (iii) reduces impacts of epilepsy and improves quality-of-life; and (iv) provides gains to the healthcare system when rolled-out into the National Health Service (NHS). 33 participants with drug-resistant epilepsy will be implanted with the UNEEG™ SubQ device and will collect data for six months. Annotated seizures from the EEG data will be sent weekly to the treating clinicians, who will communicate with the participants on a monthly basis, and will be free to make any management changes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Have given written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of treatment-resistant epilepsy of any syndrome in which seizures are detectable in scalp EEG with two electrodes.
  • Adults (≥18 years of age)
  • Participant routinely keeps a seizure diary, has a smartphone and is willing to use the electronic diary for the study.
  • Experiencing ≥10 seizures per year according to their existing seizure diary.
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures

排除标准

  • Established current diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic attacks (dissociative seizures)
  • Frequent vigorous involuntary movements (eg. chorea, athetosis) or frequent parasomnias with major motor components (eg. sleep walking, night terrors)

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid data review of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution

时间窗: 6 months

Within-participant correlation between seizure counts per month estimated from rapid review of annotated 24/7 EEG™ SubQ data and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month

Diagnostic accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution compared to diary

时间窗: 6 months

Within-participant correlation between seizure counts per month from participant-reported seizure diary and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month

Clinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ

时间窗: 6 months

Clinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution

次要结局

  • health economic impact of epilepsy for participants compared to historical controls(6 months)
  • Cost-effectiveness of current practice and 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution(6 months)
  • EQ-5D-5L score comparison with historical controls(6 months)
  • Proportion of treating clinicians changing clinical management(months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
  • Participants' perception of the value of receiving feedback about seizure occurrences estimated from EEG data recorded with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ(6 months)
  • Participant adherence with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution(6 months)
  • Device deficiency(6 months)
  • Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score comparison with historical controls(6 months)
  • participants' acceptability of real-world implementation with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • Clinical relevance of the 24/7 EEG SubQ solution(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • EQ-5D-5L score(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • Impact of epilepsy score comparison with historical controls(6 months)
  • Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • Impact of epilepsy score(baseline, 2 months and 6 months)
  • health economic impact of epilepsy for participants that have used the 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution(6 months)
  • Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score comparison with historical controls(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验