跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03439631
NCT03439631已完成不适用

ACTION in the OR: Patient Satisfaction With High Efficiency OR Design in Orthopedic Surgery

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2018年2月28日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
200
试验地点
2
主要终点
Patient surgical Experience Satisfaction survey

研究概览

简要总结

Operating room (OR) costs consume a significant portion of hospital budgets. Standard or "Status Quo" ORs are equipped with the same, fixed set of assigned resources, regardless of case complexity or actual resource requirements. Allocation of resources in standard ORs is the same whether the participant is having heart surgery or bunion removal.

The investigators propose a strategy for OR design and set up wherein resources are carefully matched to procedure complexity as a novel means of healthcare delivery.

This prospective, comparative cohort pilot study will compare two operating room (OR) setup designs. The Tiered OR setup (study intervention) will be an efficiently staffed and equipped OR, geared to the complexity of the surgical procedure. The level of care provided would be equivalent to that of an out-patient day surgery setup. The Status Quo OR setup (control intervention) will be a standard fully equipped, fully staffed OR.

详细描述

There is an unmet demand for surgical services in Ontario. The situation worsens as the population ages(9). Ontario healthcare costs account for a staggering 40% of the provincial budget(1).Provincial budget deficits mean an influx of healthcare resources are not forthcoming. The aging population costs Ontarians in excess of $2 billion dollars annually(1).

Constrained and overburdened OR resources can result in patients having surgery at night and sometimes surgical procedures being performed by staff not specialized for surgical procedure type(8). Moreover, patient outcomes often decline while they await their surgical date(4, 10-13).

Operating rooms are regarded as an area of intensive resource requirements. With no regard to the complexity of a given procedure or demonstrable resource requirements, ORs are typically managed at critical care levels. This is true for specialized support staff like nurses as well(14). Allocation of resources is not tailored to the individual scenario. This inefficient model of surgical care delivery has been the status quo for decades and the fiscal impact, as well as the challenges this poses to productivity, have taken a toll on hospital budgets and contributed to lengthy provincial wait times for surgical procedures stretching months and even years. For example, according to Health Quality Ontario, the average wait times for elective orthopaedic surgery procedures at London Health Science Center (LHSC) is 96 days to first surgical consultation and an average of 211 days to operating on the patient.

Faced with rising costs in an aging population, the investigators are compelled to find innovative solutions that will allow hospitals to accomplish more with less. These changes are necessary to maintain the standard of Canadian healthcare system and provide timely services in a cost-efficient manner.

Standard or "Status quo" OR set ups are always equipped with the same, fixed set of assigned resources, regardless of case complexity or actual resource requirements. Allocation of resources in standard ORs is the same whether one is having heart surgery or bunion removal.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • ≥18 years of age
  • No significant co-morbidities preventing outpatient day surgery
  • Undergoing procedures considered a Low Surgical Resource Requirement of relatively short duration with minimal equipment needs (e.g. bunion, revisions, ankle fractures, removal of hardware etc.)
  • Procedures allowing for standardization of equipment and staff

排除标准

  • • Refusal to participate
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Likely problems maintaining follow-up in the opinion of the investigator
  • Undergoing multiple operative procedures
  • Unable to read/write English even with the aid of an interpreter (for consent and questionnaire completion).

结局指标

主要结局

Patient surgical Experience Satisfaction survey

时间窗: 2 weeks post surgery

patient satisfaction with surgical process

EQ5D- 5L

时间窗: 2, 6 weeks, 3, 6 months

change in patient satisfaction with quality of life

NSQIP Patient Reported Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire

时间窗: 6 weeks post surgery

patient satisfaction with surgical process

次要结局

  • Resource Utilization Cost Data(baseline to 6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Abdelrahman Lawendy

PI

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Patient Satisfaction With Tiered OR Versus Status... | 临床试验