Effects of SMART Training Intervention Versus Foot Intensive Rehabilitation (FIRE) on Strength and Performance in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 25
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
研究概览
简要总结
The study was a randomized clinical trial with the sample size of 26. The study was conducted at Sports Club Sheikhupura. Subjects were enrolled according to eligibility criteria. Patients were divided into two groups, each with 13 patients. Group A received SMART training intervention and warm-up exercises, while group B received Foot intensive rehabilitation exercises (FIRE) and warm up exercises. The session was around 45 to 60 min on each patient with three sessions per week on alternate days. A total of Three weeks treatment regime was given to the patients and assessment of patient's strength (CAIT) and performance (FAAM) was done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after six weeks to observe the long-term effects.
详细描述
Ankle sprain is one of the most common sports injuries in physically active individuals and causes a high financial burden on the healthcare system. Seventy-four percent of patients with an acute ankle sprain suffered from residual symptoms lasting 29 months after the initial ankle sprain, such as pain, perceived instability, weakness and swelling. Lateral ankle sprains (LASs) are a common injury sustained by individuals who participate in recreational physical activities and sports. After LAS, a large proportion of individuals develop long-term symptoms, which contribute to the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI).The aim of this study to determine the comparative effects of SMART training intervention versus foot intensive rehabilitation (FIRE) on strength and performance in athletes with chronic ankle instability.
The study was a randomized clinical trial with the sample size of 26. The study was conducted at Sports Club Sheikhupura. Subjects was enrolled according to eligibility criteria. Patients was divided into two groups, each with 13 patients. Group A received SMART training intervention and warm-up exercises, while group B received Foot intensive rehabilitation exercises (FIRE) and warm up exercises. The session was around 45 to 60 min on each patient with three sessions per week on alternate days. A total of Three weeks treatment regime was given to the patients and assessment of patient's strength (CAIT) and performance (FAAM) was done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after six weeks to observe the long-term effects.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Athletes 18-45 years of age,
- •2 repeated episodes of giving way, feelings of instability
- •Core training not less than 4 week.
- •Chronic ankle instability more than 6 months.
- •Repeated ankle sprain more than twice and patients with <24 points based on CAIT.
- •Athletes with single side ankle instability
排除标准
- •Acute concomitant injuries of the ankle.
- •Individuals who were able to return to pre-injury levels of activity
- •Serious lower-extremity injuries of the last 6 months
- •Lower-extremity surgery, and neurological diseases
- •Simultaneous severe sprain of both ankle joints
结局指标
主要结局
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
时间窗: Change from Baseline at 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) was originally developed in English and proved to be of high content validity and good reliability. The main advantage of the questionnaire is that it consists of only 9 items, minimizing patient burden and increasing reliability. The precision of the instrument is increased as it is a multiple answer option instrument
Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM)
时间窗: Change from Baseline at 3 weeks and 6 weeks
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) assess the functional limitation of the foot and ankle. The FAAM has 29 items, scored between 0 and 4, divided into two sub-scales: activities of daily living (21 items) and sports (8 items)(24).For score analysis, the percentage of each sub scale is used separately. For FAAM ADL, person reliability is 0.87 and item reliability is0.99. For FAAM Sport, person reliability is 0.89 and item reliability is 1.0
次要结局
未报告次要终点
