跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00311181
NCT00311181已完成4 期

Phase 4 Study That Compares the DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) Efficacy of 3 Different Membrane Time Constant Based Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms

Abbott Medical Devices2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 217 人开始时间: 2006年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
217
试验地点
2
主要终点
Defibrillation Thresholds (DFTs) (3.5 ms Waveform)

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to compare the ULV (Upper Limit of Vulnerability)/DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) efficacy between the 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms membrane time constant based biphasic defibrillation waveforms. This comparison will result in identifying the optimal membrane time constant when programming the "tuned" defibrillation waveform.

详细描述

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a significant cause of cardiac mortality with annual deaths ranging from 250,000 to 400,000 in the United States. Accordingly, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD's) have proven to be an important therapeutic option for patients susceptible to SCD. Successful therapy and generator longevity are greatly dependent on proper defibrillation threshold (DFT) determination.

All modern ICD's utilize a biphasic waveform for defibrillation. It has been clearly shown that biphasic waveforms reduce the energy required for internal defibrillation of the heart. However, there is no consensus on which pulse widths are best for defibrillation.

St. Jude Medical ICD's (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) have programmable pulse widths, which allow the physician multiple options in dealing with ICD patients. By implanting ICD's with programmable pulse widths, this study utilizes the Tissue RC Resistance/Capacitance) model to try to identify the optimal pulse widths.

To determine the efficacy of an optimal membrane time constant estimate for the "tuned" waveform, defibrillation testing must be performed. Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) has been proposed as an alternative means of predicting the DFT and it has been shown that ULV guided DFT testing can achieve a defibrillation success rate of 95%.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patient is a candidate for ICD/CRT-D implantation.
  • •Patient has a compatible transvenous defibrillation lead system.
  • •Patient has had an echocardiogram, MUGA, or cath procedure within 6 months of ICD/CRT-D implant.
  • •Patient is able to tolerate ULV guided DFT testing.

排除标准

  • •Patient has a mechanical valve in the tricuspid position.
  • •Patient has epicardial defibrillation electrodes.
  • •Patient is pregnant.
  • •Patient is less than 18 years old.

研究组 & 干预措施

2.5/3.5/4.5 ms defibrillation waveform

Experimental

干预措施: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Defibrillation Thresholds (DFTs) (3.5 ms Waveform)

时间窗: Implant

DFT (2.5 ms Waveform)

时间窗: Implant

DFT (4.5 ms Waveform)

时间窗: Implant

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验