Artificial Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System Simulation Center Study: Trust and Usefulness of Machine Learning Risk Stratification Tool for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using the Technology Acceptance Model
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 108
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change in Attitudes Towards Machine Learning Algorithms in Clinical Care using UTAUT
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this research study is to measure the effect on of a large language model interface on the usability, attitudes, and provider trust when using a machine learning algorithm-based clinical decision support system in the setting of bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract (upper GIB). Specifically, the investigators are looking to assess the optimal implementation of such machine learning algorithms in simulation scenarios to best engender trust and improve usability. Participants will be randomized to either machine learning algorithm alone or algorithm with a large language model interface and exposed to simulation cases of upper GIB.
详细描述
The experiment will deploy a previously validated machine learning algorithm trained on existing clinical datasets within simulation scenarios in which a patient with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (at low, moderate, and high risk for poor outcome) is evaluated.
Prior to the simulation, a baseline educational module about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and clinical decision support will be provided to all participants. The investigators will establish psychological safety by detailing what is available in the room, the opportunity to call a consultant, and availability of laboratory and radiographic studies. Each clinical scenario will run for approximately 10 minutes based on real patient cases where vital signs change over time and laboratory values are made available at specific points in the assessment. The study will evaluate the effect of a large language model-based interaction with the machine learning algorithm with interpretability dashboard compared to the machine learning algorithm with interpretability dashboard alone. Each participant will receive three scenarios in randomized order of risk.
For the large language model interaction arm, participants will be provided the computer workstation a LLM chatbot interface of the algorithm and interpretability dashboard For the machine learning dashboard arm, participants will be provided the computer workstation with the algorithm and interpretability dashboard.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Internal Medicine residency trainees at study institution
- •Emergency Medicine residency trainees at study institution
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Large Language Model-based Interaction
LLM-powered chatbot with the machine learning dashboard to provide the risk assessment and provide rationale based on interpretability metrics provided by the dashboard in which study participants can directly interact with using natural language. Participants will be provided the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) chatbot powered machine learning model dashboard.
干预措施: LLM (Other)
Machine Learning Dashboard
Machine learning algorithm output with an interactive dashboard that can be used to explain, or interpret the input factors that contribute most towards the generated risk score. Participants will have access to the machine learning dashboard only.
结局指标
主要结局
Change in Attitudes Towards Machine Learning Algorithms in Clinical Care using UTAUT
时间窗: Approximately 60 minutes
The study will use a common set of dependent variables to assess baseline and post-intervention attitudes towards machine learning algorithms in clinical care using an adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) survey assessing perceived usefulness of the system, perceived ease of use, attitudes towards using it, behavioral intentions, and trust, measured with a 5-point Likert scale. Change in UTAUT survey response at recruitment prior to administration of scenarios and immediately after completion of scenarios. The difference in time between the two will be approximately 60 minutes.
Clinician Decision Making of Triage of GI bleeding
时间窗: Approximately 60 minutes
This study will determine the number of study participants (out of all study participants in the group) who accurately choose the correct clinical decision for each simulation scenario of acute upper GI bleeding for each treatment condition. Immediately after completion of scenarios (60 minutes from initiation of study for each participant). No further follow up afterwards.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
