Short Term Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Combined With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Young Football Players: a Randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 47
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The Popliteal Angle Test
研究概览
简要总结
Hamstring muscle injuries are common in sports like football and often lead to extended periods of inactivity. This study aims to compare the effects of two different stretching programs on hamstring flexibility, with a secondary focus on jumping performance in young football players. One group will perform a proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching protocol combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), while the other group will follow the same PNF protocol with a placebo NMES.
详细描述
Hamstring strains are increasingly common in sports, particularly in football, where they are among the most frequent injuries. Stretching techniques such as proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) are commonly used to improve muscle flexibility and reduce injury risk. A specific variant, contract-relax PNF (crPNF), involves alternating passive stretching with voluntary muscle contractions. Recent approaches suggest that applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during the contraction phase of crPNF may further enhance its effectiveness.
This study aims to compare the short-term effects of two active stretching protocols on hamstring flexibility in young male football players. One group will perform crPNF with sham NMES, while the other will perform crPNF with NMES during the contraction phase. A secondary objective is to assess whether either protocol affects vertical jump performance, a key ability in football.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 10 Years 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Active football players who train at least 3 days a week.
- •Ages between 10 and 18 years.
排除标准
- •Are currently engaged in a structured hamstring-stretching programme.
- •Present with acute low back pain.
- •Have sustained a hamstring injury within the past 6 months.
- •Have undergone spinal or abdominal surgery within the past 6 months.
研究组 & 干预措施
contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation with sham NMES (crPNF + sham NMES)
Participants sat in long-sitting with maximal knee extension and pelvic anteversion controlled by elastic straps over the pelvis and distal thigh. Two 5×5 cm self-adhesive electrodes were placed on the hamstrings: one two fingerbreadths below the gluteal fold (proximal) and one over the distal third of the muscle belly. Sham NMES delivered biphasic symmetric rectangular pulses (50 Hz, 250 µs) at the sensory threshold (minimal intensity eliciting only a slight tingling without visible muscle response). Each of three cycles comprised a 10 s maximal voluntary isometric hamstring contraction ("Squeeze…!") against the fixed table, immediately followed by a 30 s passive stretch to a moderate-strong but non-painful tension ("Stretch…!"). A primary researcher ensured consistent limb positioning and strap tension; a secondary researcher monitored timing and cued contractions by lightly supporting the heels.
干预措施: Sham Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (Other)
contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation with sham NMES (crPNF + sham NMES)
Participants sat in long-sitting with maximal knee extension and pelvic anteversion controlled by elastic straps over the pelvis and distal thigh. Two 5×5 cm self-adhesive electrodes were placed on the hamstrings: one two fingerbreadths below the gluteal fold (proximal) and one over the distal third of the muscle belly. Sham NMES delivered biphasic symmetric rectangular pulses (50 Hz, 250 µs) at the sensory threshold (minimal intensity eliciting only a slight tingling without visible muscle response). Each of three cycles comprised a 10 s maximal voluntary isometric hamstring contraction ("Squeeze…!") against the fixed table, immediately followed by a 30 s passive stretch to a moderate-strong but non-painful tension ("Stretch…!"). A primary researcher ensured consistent limb positioning and strap tension; a secondary researcher monitored timing and cued contractions by lightly supporting the heels.
干预措施: Contract-Relax PNF (crPNF) (Other)
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES + crPNF)
Participants sat in long-sitting with maximal knee extension and pelvic anteversion controlled by elastic straps over the pelvis and distal thigh. Two 5×5 cm self-adhesive electrodes were placed on the hamstrings: one two fingerbreadths below the gluteal fold (proximal) and one over the distal third of the muscle belly. NMES delivered biphasic symmetric rectangular pulses (50 Hz, 250 µs) at each participant's maximal motor threshold without discomfort or pain; the resulting milliamperage was recorded for each leg and used during all contraction phases. Each of three cycles comprised a 10 s maximal voluntary isometric hamstring contraction ("Squeeze…!") with NMES applied at the recorded intensity, immediately followed by a 30 s passive stretch to a moderate-strong but non-painful tension ("Stretch…!"). A primary researcher ensured consistent limb positioning and strap tension; a secondary researcher monitored timing and cued contractions by lightly supporting the heels.
干预措施: Contract-Relax PNF (crPNF) (Other)
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES + crPNF)
Participants sat in long-sitting with maximal knee extension and pelvic anteversion controlled by elastic straps over the pelvis and distal thigh. Two 5×5 cm self-adhesive electrodes were placed on the hamstrings: one two fingerbreadths below the gluteal fold (proximal) and one over the distal third of the muscle belly. NMES delivered biphasic symmetric rectangular pulses (50 Hz, 250 µs) at each participant's maximal motor threshold without discomfort or pain; the resulting milliamperage was recorded for each leg and used during all contraction phases. Each of three cycles comprised a 10 s maximal voluntary isometric hamstring contraction ("Squeeze…!") with NMES applied at the recorded intensity, immediately followed by a 30 s passive stretch to a moderate-strong but non-painful tension ("Stretch…!"). A primary researcher ensured consistent limb positioning and strap tension; a secondary researcher monitored timing and cued contractions by lightly supporting the heels.
干预措施: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
The Popliteal Angle Test
时间窗: Before and inmediately after the intervention
The Popliteal Angle Test is validated for measuring hamstring extensibility. Participants are placed in the supine position. A researcher holds the hip at a 90° flexion and passively extends the knee until the participant feels a strong stretch without pain. The examiner records the knee extension degrees at that moment using an inclinometer. The test is repeated three times, and the average is obtained. A full knee extension corresponds to a value of 0 degrees, and a higher number of degrees indicates greater hamstring shortening.
The Sit & Reach Test
时间窗: Before and inmediately after the intervention
The Sit \& Reach Test has high intra-examiner reliability and is validated for measuring hamstring extensibility. For its execution, participants are placed in a long sitting position with the soles of their feet against the base of the measurement box. Keeping their knees extended, they reach for the maximum possible distance in the box with their fingers. The test is repeated three times, and the average is obtained. Values are recorded in centimeters, where a greater distance indicates a higher degree of hamstring extensibility.
次要结局
- The Counter Movement Jump(Before and inmediately after the intervention)
研究者
Juan F. Lisón Párraga, Dr
Professor
Cardenal Herrera University
