跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07790042
NCT07790042尚未招募不适用

Effects of Kinesio Taping on Pain, Pressure Pain Threshold, Trapezius Muscle Thickness, and Strain Elastography in Patients With Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

Pamukkale University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2026年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of the upper trapezius trigger point

研究概览

简要总结

Myofascial pain syndrome is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain, and the upper trapezius is the muscle most frequently affected in the neck and shoulder region. Kinesio taping is a non-invasive, painless and low-cost method that is increasingly used in the treatment of myofascial trigger points, but its true therapeutic effect beyond placebo has not been clearly established.

The purpose of this randomized, sham-controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of kinesio taping applied with the muscle inhibition technique on myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius muscle. Forty patients with an active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either therapeutic kinesio taping or sham taping (20 patients per group). Both groups will receive four applications over two weeks (twice weekly). The primary outcome is the pressure pain threshold measured with a digital algometer. Secondary outcomes are pain intensity, trapezius muscle thickness measured by B-mode ultrasonography, and muscle stiffness assessed by strain elastography. All outcomes are assessed at baseline, on day 3, and at the end of the two-week treatment period.

详细描述

Myofascial pain syndrome is characterized by hyperirritable nodules located within taut bands of skeletal muscle, known as myofascial trigger points. The upper trapezius is the most commonly involved muscle in the neck and shoulder girdle, and trigger points in this region are an important cause of neck pain, restricted mobility and loss of productivity.

Kinesio taping has become increasingly popular in the management of myofascial trigger points because it is non-invasive, painless, inexpensive and has few adverse effects. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that kinesio taping reduces pain intensity and improves pressure pain threshold and range of motion in myofascial pain syndrome. However, the taping techniques used across studies differ substantially. Two techniques predominate: the space correction technique, in which strips are applied over the trigger point in a star-shaped pattern, and the muscle inhibition technique, in which a single I-strip is applied along the muscle fibres from insertion to origin with low tension. A trial directly comparing these two techniques found no significant difference between them, whereas a sham-controlled trial found that the space correction technique was not superior to sham at 72 hours. Studies using the inhibition technique have reported significant improvements in pressure pain threshold. Because the inhibition technique is mechanistically aimed at reducing muscle tone and is supported by stronger evidence, it was selected for this trial.

In addition, outcome measures in previous studies have been largely subjective. Pressure algometry provides a quantitative measure of the mechanical sensitivity of the trigger point, while B-mode ultrasonography allows measurement of muscle thickness and ultrasound elastography allows objective assessment of tissue stiffness. Strain elastography with calculation of the strain ratio has shown good reliability in patients with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome and can differentiate active trigger points, latent trigger points and control sites.

To the best of our knowledge, no sham-controlled randomized trial has evaluated kinesio taping of upper trapezius myofascial trigger points using pressure pain threshold as the primary outcome together with muscle thickness and strain elastography as objective secondary outcomes. A sham-controlled design was chosen because sham taping alone may produce a substantial placebo response, and only a sham comparator can isolate the true therapeutic effect.

In the intervention group, a single I-shaped kinesio tape strip will be applied from insertion to origin along the upper trapezius with 15-25% tension while the muscle is held in a stretched position. In the sham group, an identical tape of the same brand, colour and size will be applied to the same region without therapeutic tension and with the neck in a neutral position, so that the skin convolutions responsible for the therapeutic effect are not produced. Both groups will receive four applications over two weeks (twice weekly); at each session the existing tape is removed and a new tape applied, so the tape remains on the skin continuously throughout the treatment period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The practitioner applying the tape cannot be blinded due to the nature of the intervention and takes no part in outcome assessment. All measurements are performed by a blinded assessor after tape removal.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age between 18 and 65 years
  • •At least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle diagnosed on clinical examination according to the criteria of Travell and Simons
  • •Neck and/or shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months
  • •Able to understand the procedures, benefits and possible adverse effects
  • •Able to provide written informed consent

排除标准

  • •Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome
  • •Cervical disc herniation, radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • •History of cervical or shoulder surgery
  • •History of trauma, fracture or structural deformity of the neck region
  • •Inflammatory rheumatic disease, malignancy or serious systemic disease
  • •Neurological disease or peripheral neuropathy
  • •Kinesio taping to the trigger point, injection, dry needling or physical therapy to the neck region within the previous 6 months
  • •Use of analgesics, muscle relaxants or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within the previous week
  • •Active skin lesion, wound, dermatological disease or known allergy to tape at the application site
  • •Pregnancy or lactation

研究组 & 干预措施

Kinesio Taping

Experimental

Therapeutic kinesio taping applied to the myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius using the muscle inhibition technique. A single I-shaped strip is applied from insertion to origin along the muscle fibres with 15-25% tension while the muscle is held in a stretched position (shoulder depressed, neck in contralateral lateral flexion and rotation). Four applications over two weeks (twice weekly).

干预措施: Kinesio Taping (muscle inhibition technique) (Other)

Sham Kinesio Taping

Sham Comparator

Sham taping using tape of identical brand, colour and size, applied by the same practitioner to the same anatomical region, with no therapeutic tension (0% tension) and with the neck in a neutral position, so that no skin convolutions are produced. Four applications over two weeks (twice weekly), identical in frequency and duration to the intervention group.

干预措施: Sham Kinesio Taping (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of the upper trapezius trigger point

时间窗: Baseline, day 3, and end of week 2

Pressure pain threshold measured over the marked trigger point with a digital algometer with the participant prone and the muscle relaxed. The probe is applied perpendicular to the trigger point and pressure is increased at approximately 1 kg/cm2/s. The participant reports verbally when the pressure first becomes painful. The mean of three measurements taken at least 30 seconds apart is used. An increase indicates reduced trigger point sensitivity.

次要结局

  • Change in pain intensity measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)(Baseline, day 3, and end of week 2)
  • Change in upper trapezius muscle thickness measured by B-mode ultrasonography(Baseline, day 3, and end of week 2)
  • Change in muscle stiffness measured by strain elastography (strain ratio)(Baseline, day 3, and end of week 2)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alev Atıgan

Assistant Professor

Pamukkale University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验