跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2022/12/048230
CTRI/2022/12/048230已完成3 期

COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CLOTRIMAZOLE VAGINAL FILM VS CANESTEN V6 VAGINAL TABLET IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS IN NON PREGNANT WOMEN - OPEN LABEL, RANDOMIZED, COMPARATIVE, PARALLEL, PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTRIC STUDY

Hetero Healthcare Limited0 个研究点目标入组 300 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
300

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1. Women aged 18 to 45 years with clinical diagnosis of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis.
  • 2. Subjects with positive baseline potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet mount from a vaginal smear revealing filamentous hyphae / pseudo hyphae or budding yeast cells.
  • 3. Presence of > 1 vulvovaginal sign (erythema, edema, excoriation), presence of > 1 vulvovaginal symptom (itching / pruritus, irritation in and around vagina, burning); composite severity score of > 6.
  • 4. Patients with negative whiff test.
  • 5. Patients with vaginal pH < 4.5.
  • 6. Agree to abstain from intercourse during the study period.
  • 7. Agree not to douche or use any intravaginal products during the study period.
  • 8. Willing to report response to treatment as per protocol during the study period.
  • 9. Willing to give written informed consent

排除标准

  • 1. Post-menopausal women
  • 2. Menstruating at diagnosis
  • 3. Pregnancy or nursing mothers
  • 4. Use of intravaginal pessaries, immune suppressive therapy in the last 2 weeks.
  • 5. Presence of another vaginal condition, cervical cancer.
  • 6. H/O hypersensitivity to study medication, serious illness.

研究者

发起方
Hetero Healthcare Limited

相似试验