跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04539145
NCT04539145Unknown4 期

Chocolate PTA Balloon Compared to Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Sustained Lumen Gain in Below the Knee Arteries - CHOCO-CABANA Trial-

Klinikum Rosenheim15 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2020年8月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
发起方
入组人数
120
试验地点
15
主要终点
Recoil (lumen loss > 30%) 15-30 min after study intervention angiographically documented and analyzed by a core-lab

研究概览

简要总结

The study will be performed 120 patients at about 6 to 8 study centers. Only patients with clinical conditions requiring assessment of patency of the treated BTK lesions at 6 months post procedure by MRA as part of standard care to prevent amputations as consequence of non-detected re-stenosis/occlusions will be included in the study. The sequence in which the individual patients will be treated will be randomized with the Chocolate PTA balloon and the uncoated conventional PTA balloon at each center. 60 patients will be randomized to uncoated conventional PTA balloon treatment and 60 patients to treatment with the Chocolate PTA balloon.

All lesions in each patient (lesions that fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria) should be treated as the patient is randomized.

In patients with long lesions more than one balloon may be used. Overlapping of balloons (at least 10mm) is mandatory to avoid untreated gaps between sequential treatments. Follow up will be performed at 1 and 6 months.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Randomization per envelope

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • >18 years of age
  • Chronic stenotic or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries
  • Patients with clinical conditions requiring assessment of vessel patency of treated BTK lesion 6 months post procedure as part of clinical standard of care to prevent amputa-tions as consequence of non-detected re-stenosis
  • BTK intervention with lesions between 1 and 25 cm
  • Sufficient outflow of the treated artery to the foot (less than 50% stenosis or sufficient collaterals)
  • All BTK lesions either to be treated with conventional PTA or with the Chocolate PTA balloon (if inclusion criteria 4 and 5 apply)*
  • * The longest lesion will be taken as primary lesion. All other lesions will be also analyzed within the study protocol but separately evaluated. If a secondary lesion does not fulfill the inclusion criteria 4 and 5, the lesion can be treated upon the decision of the operator and will not be analyzed within the study protocol.
  • Rutherford 3-5 patients
  • Patients who are able to be followed to assess vessel patency according to standard lo-cal hospital care (e.g. DUS, MRA)
  • Successfully treated inflow lesions up to TASC B

排除标准

  • Acute or sub-acute thrombosis
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Rutherford 1-2 and 6
  • Patient who is not fit for follow-up (including contraindication for MRA)
  • Vessel preparation with cutting balloon, lithotripsie, atherectomy

结局指标

主要结局

Recoil (lumen loss > 30%) 15-30 min after study intervention angiographically documented and analyzed by a core-lab

时间窗: 15-30 min after study intervention

The minimal lumen of the artery in the area of Intervention in mm will be compared directly after the Intervention and at 15-30 minuntes

次要结局

  • the loss of patency greater than 50% in the MRA after six month(6 month)
  • the re-occlusion rate at 6 months (measured by MRA)(6 month)
  • Residual stenosis (MLD post compared to RVD, % of RVD) >50% after the invention(immedetely after the intervention)
  • Wound status at 1 and 6 months:(1 and 6 months)
  • target lesion revascularization TLR rate at 1 and 6 months(1 and 6 months)
  • Amputation rate at 1 and 6 months(1 and 6 months)
  • Clinical presentation (Rutherford 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 at 30 days and 6 months(1 and 6 month)
  • Ancle brachial index (ABI) compared to baseline and post intervention and 6 months(directly after the intervention and 6 month)
  • DUS vs. MRA at 6 months(6 month)

研究者

发起方
Klinikum Rosenheim
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar Tepe

Chief Physician of the Radiology Department

Klinikum Rosenheim

研究点 (15)

Loading locations...

相似试验