Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Strategies in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 300
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To study the cost-effectiveness ratios of diagnostic strategies for the imaging assessment of symptomatic carotid stenosis
研究概览
简要总结
PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial is to study the cost-effectiveness ratios of diagnostic strategies for the imaging assessment of symptomatic carotid stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracies of Doppler ultrasound (DUS), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in a multicenter study (CARMEDAS; 206 patients assessable) and in a meta-analysis (for CEMRA and CTA). The direct costs of each imaging method were calculated in 2 university medical centers. Eight hypothetical models were studied with DUS considered as the first-line imaging method and either CEMRA or CTA or DSA as the second or third line method. The effectiveness criterion was the number of potential avoided strokes for each strategy and for 1000 patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Carotid artery stenosis > 50%
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
To study the cost-effectiveness ratios of diagnostic strategies for the imaging assessment of symptomatic carotid stenosis
次要结局
未报告次要终点
