A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy of Primary Thrombectomy With Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT) as an Initial Attempt at Thrombectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 180
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Complete recanalization on first pass
研究概览
简要总结
The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary.
Our goal is to develop a research project to provide additional information on the potential benefits of the simultaneous double stent approach primarily in stroke patients receiving TVS.
A randomized study to compare the efficacy of double primary SR versus single primary SR
详细描述
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open and blinded trial of patients with acute stroke with acute large vessel occlusion (LGO) identified by ASD, in which two strategies will be compared: primary double stent (DS-EVT) versus simple stent (SS-EVT) as an initial attempt at thrombectomy.
Assignment will be stratified according to the initial location of the occlusion: terminal ICA, distal M1, and basilar artery.
The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of the primary strategy DS-EVT defined as first-pass angiographic complete recanalization (TICI 2c-3) compared to SS-EVT.
The primary safety endpoint will assess the safety of the primary DS-EVT strategy compared to SS-EVT, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), along with any other serious procedure-related adverse events. (excluding those already accounted for in sICH) within 24 hours (-8/+12) after the procedure.
A designated Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the primary safety endpoint after every 25 new patients enrolled in the study and determine continuation of the study based on the occurrence of adverse events in each study arm to assess early completion of the study. A first interim efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolling 106 patients and enrollment will be stopped if a significant difference in first-pass recanalization between both groups is demonstrated according to pre-specified stopping rules.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Complete recanalization on first pass
时间窗: 4 months
Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the simple stent group, defined as TiCI greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale)
次要结局
- Embolization in new territories(4 months)
- Mortality(4 months)
- Intracerebral hemorrhage(4 months)
- Neurological impairment(4 months)
- Infarct in new territory(4 months)
