跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06805344
NCT06805344尚未招募不适用

Out-of-hospital Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

General University Hospital, Prague0 个研究点目标入组 686 人开始时间: 2025年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
686
主要终点
90-day survival

研究概览

简要总结

The OSIRIS trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 2:1 concealed allocation of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) based approach versus the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) approach.

详细描述

ECPR for OHCA is a resource-intensive method and poses significant challenges for both prehospital and hospital systems. Recent meta-analyses have highlighted persisting uncertainties regarding the routine use of ECPR strategy for OHCA, emphasizing the need for further research.

The refractory OHCA trial is a multicenter, multinational, open-label, randomized trial with a 2:1 concealed allocation of refractory OHCA patients to ECPR-based approach versus CCPR approach.

ECPR-based approach is defined as advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines with aim to proceed to in-hospital or out-of-hospital veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) if (return of spontaneous circulation) ROSC is not achieved before the cannulation.

CCPR is defined as conventional ACLS per current guidelines without mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use until sustained ROSC is achieved or the patient pronounced dead.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that invasive, ECPR-based approach when compared to CCPR:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age ≥18 and ≤ 70 years presumed or known
  • •Witnessed OHCA
  • •Bystander CPR provided
  • •Presumed cardiac or unknown cause
  • •An initial documented shockable rhythm of VF (ventricular fibrillation) or pulseless VT (ventricular tachycardia)
  • •Minimum of ≥ 10 min of ACLS without ROSC or at least ≥ 3 defibrillations in ongoing VF/pulseless VT
  • •Body morphology able to accommodate a mechanical chest compression device
  • •ECPR team and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity in the receiving center available
  • •Estimated transfer time from the scene to the hospital ≤ 30 minutes or to the scene ≤ 30 minutes
  • •Eligible for intensive care without restrictions or limitations

排除标准

  • •ACLS ≥ 30 minutes before randomization
  • •Known limitations in care or a Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR) order
  • •Known severe disease making 90-day survival unlikely
  • •Known bleeding diathesis or acute or recent intracranial bleeding
  • •Known, obvious or suspected pregnancy
  • •Known pre-arrest severe cognitive dysfunction (mRS ≥ 4)
  • •Known hypothermia as a cause of cardiac arrest

研究组 & 干预措施

ECPR-based

Experimental

ECPR-based approach is defined as advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines with aim to proceed to in-hospital or out-of-hospital veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved before the cannulation.

干预措施: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation based approach (Procedure)

CCPR

Active Comparator

CCPR is defined as conventional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines without mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use until sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved or the patient pronounced dead.

干预措施: Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

90-day survival

时间窗: 90-days

90-day survival

次要结局

  • 90-day neurological outcome(90-days)
  • 90-day Health-related quality of life(90-days)

研究者

发起方
General University Hospital, Prague
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jan Bělohlávek

professor

General University Hospital, Prague

相似试验