跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01142167
NCT01142167已完成3 期

A Study to Assess the Success Rate of Ultra-thin Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy for the First or Rescue Colonoscopy for Unsuccessful Procedures (UTC Study).

Chinese University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,121 人开始时间: 2009年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,121
试验地点
1
主要终点
Successful Caecal intubation

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to study the caecal intubation rate of a prototype ultra-thin colonoscope compared to a standard colonoscope and to study usefulness of this new colonoscope as a rescue instrument for failed initial colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope and to study the patient satisfaction scores using a validated endoscopy GHAA-9 for a new prototype colonoscope as compared to a standard colonoscope.

详细描述

Colonoscopy is a common endoscopic procedure, widely used for the investigation of lower gastrointestinal tract diseases manifesting as altered bowel habit, per rectal bleeding and abdominal pain. It is used to diagnose colonic polyps, colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease to name a few examples.

Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to decrease colorectal cancer. Despite this the uptake by the general population is suboptimal.

A new prototype colonoscope from Olympus with an additional distal bending section was designed. The investigators hypothesize that its performance characteristics will be similar to a standard colonoscope with patient tolerability.

This randomised control trial aims to invite patients attending their first outpatient colonoscopy and who are able to provide informed consent.(so they have had no prior experience) to assess the completion rate, patient and endoscopist satisfaction.

Patients with prior colorectal surgery or previous colonoscopy were excluded.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First outpatient colonoscopy
  • Able to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Unable to provide consent
  • Prior colon surgery (except appendectomy)

研究组 & 干预措施

Standard Colonoscopy

Active Comparator

Colonoscopy with standard instrument

干预措施: Standard Colonoscopy (Procedure)

Ultra-thin colonoscopy

Experimental

New prototype scope

干预措施: Ultra-thin colonoscopy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Successful Caecal intubation

时间窗: 12 weeks

Success of Caecal intubation for the ultra-thin colonoscope vs standard colonoscope

次要结局

  • Caecal intubation time(12 weeks)
  • Patient Satisfaction and Pain score(12 weeks)
  • Endoscopist satisfaction(12 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

James Yun-wong Lau

Professor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验