KCT0008180招募中未知
Comparisons of cold endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm sized colorectal polyps, multi-center randomized controlled trial
Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam0 个研究点目标入组 658 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 658
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional Study
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19(Year) 至 o Limit（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients will be included in the study if they fulfill the following criteria:
- •Age of >19 years able to provide written informed consent
- •patient with 4-9 mm sized colorectal polyp
排除标准
- •Patients will be excluded in the study if they fulfill the following criteria:
- •Age of <19 years
- •inable to provide written informed consent
- •patient with confirmed malignant polyp, suspected malignant polyp, previously incomplete resection polyp, subepithelial lesion
- •inflammatory bowel disease patients, uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy patients, coagulopathy patients
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
cold endoscopic mucosal resection vs. endoscopic mucosal resectioKCT0007178Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam140
已完成
不适用
cold EMR vs. endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polypsDiseases of the digestive systemKCT0007181Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam140
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparing cold endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for intermediate sized colorectal polypsKCT0009527Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam526
尚未招募
不适用
EMR Versus CSP in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in SizeColorectal Sessile Serrated LesionNCT06609031Fudan University270
招募中
不适用
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)Colorectal PolypColon AdenomaColon CancerNCT05041478Western Sydney Local Health District300