跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04843176
NCT04843176招募中不适用

A Prototype Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Versus Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Criteria in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Computed Tomography: a Randomized Trial

The University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 250 人开始时间: 2021年3月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
250
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy for HCC

研究概览

简要总结

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It is the 3rd most common cause of cancer death in Hong Kong. The five-year survival rates of liver cancer differ greatly with disease staging, ranging from 91.5% in early-stage to 11% in late-stage. The early and accurate diagnosis of liver cancer is paramount in improving cancer survival. Liver cancer is diagnosed radiologically via cross sectional imaging, e.g. computed tomography (CT), without the routine use of liver biopsy. However, with current internationally-recommended radiological reporting methods, up to 49% of liver lesions may be inconclusive, resulting in repeated scans and a delay in diagnosis and treatment. An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that that can accurately diagnosed liver cancer has been developed. Based on an interim analysis, the algorithm achieved a high diagnostic accuracy. The AI algorithm is now ready for implementation.

This study aims to prospective validate this AI algorithm in comparison with the current standard of radiological reporting in a randomized manner in the at-risk population undergoing triphasic contrast CT. This research project is totally independent and separated from the actual clinical reporting of the CT scan by the duty radiologist. The primary study outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of liver cancer, which will be unbiasedly based on a composite clinical reference standard.

详细描述

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The main disease burden is found in East Asia, in which the age-standardized incidence is 26.8 and 8.7 per 100,000 in men and women respectively. In 2017, among the top 10 most common cancers in Hong Kong, liver cancer had the highest case fatality rate of 84.6%. The five-year survival rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) differ greatly with disease staging, ranging from 91.5% in <2 cm with surgical resection to 11% in >5 cm with adjacent organ involvement. The early and accurate diagnosis of HCC is paramount in improving cancer survival.

Unlike other common cancers, HCC is diagnosed by highly characteristic dynamic patterns on contrast-enhanced cross sectional imaging, without the need of pathological confirmation. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was established to standardize the lexicon, interpretation and communication of radiological findings related to HCC. However, up to 49% of nodules identified in computed tomography (CT) in the at-risk population are categorized by LI-RADS as indeterminate, further delaying the establishment of diagnosis.

There are currently studies pioneering the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of medical imaging. A interdisciplinary research team of clinicians, radiologists and statistical scientists, based on the clinical and radiological database of over 4,000 liver images, and have developed an AI algorithm to accurately diagnose liver cancer on CT. Based on retrospective data, an interim analysis found the AI algorithm able to achieve a diagnostic accuracy of >97% and a negative predictive value of >99%.

Can this novel prototype AI algorithm achieve a better performance in diagnosing HCC in the at-risk population when compared to LI-RADS? This question is especially relevant when the key to improved survival is early diagnosis, of which AI can potentially improve. Currently, errors in radiologist reporting are estimated to be 3-5% on a day-to-basis, equating to 40 million errors per annum worldwide. This prototype algorithm can be a solution to reduce human misinterpretation of radiological findings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Investigator)

盲法说明

. Both radiologists will be blinded to the clinical characteristics and subsequent management of participants, with any discordance in assessment resolved by consensus before reaching a final decision.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age >=18 years.
  • Defined as the at-risk population requiring regular liver ultrasonography surveillance. These include:
  • Cirrhotic patients of any disease etiology,
  • Chronic hepatitis B patients of age ≥40 years for men, age ≥50 years for women or with a family history of HCC.
  • At least one new-onset focal liver nodule detected on liver ultrasonography.

排除标准

  • Liver nodules of <1 cm. Currently such nodules are not reported using LI-RADS criteria but are recommended for a repeat scan in 3-6 months. In patients with multiple liver nodules, the largest nodule will be assessed.
  • Patients with contraindications for contrast CT imaging, including a history of contrast anaphylaxis and impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min).
  • Patients with prior transarterial chemoembolization or other interventional procedures with intrahepatic injection of lipiodol. Lipiodol is extremely hyperdense on computed tomography and will preclude objective interpretation. Such patients were also excluded in the development of our prototype AI algorithm.

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy for HCC

时间窗: 12 months

Number of participants diagnosed with HCC using a composite clinical reference standard. A lesion will be considered positive for HCC based on histology (biopsy, surgical resection or explant) or achieving LR-5 criteria in subsequent imaging. A lesion will be considered negative for HCC if it demonstrated stability at imaging for at least 12 months, unequivocal spontaneous reduction, or disappearance in the absence of tumor treatment.

次要结局

  • Other diagnostic performance parameters for HCC(12 months)
  • Occurrence of technical failures(12 months)
  • Interpretation time(12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验