跳至主要内容
临床试验/JPRN-UMIN000027606
JPRN-UMIN000027606已完成未知

Clinical outcome of combined metallic stent placement in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction - Clinical outcome of double stenting

agoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2017年6月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100

研究概览

简要总结

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary and duodenal stenting (DS; double stenting) is widely accepted as a palliation therapy for malignant bilioduodenal obstruction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the patency and adverse events of duodenal and biliary stents in patients with DS. METHODS: Patients who underwent DS from April 2004 to March 2017 were analyzed retrospectively with regard to clinical outcomes and predictive factors of recurrent biliary and duodenal obstruction (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] and recurrent duodenal obstruction [RDO]). RESULTS: A total of 109 consecutive patients was enrolled. Technical success of DS was achieved in 108 patients (99.1%). Symptoms due to biliary and duodenal obstruction were improved in 89 patients (81.7%). RBO occurred in 25 patients (22.9%) and RDO in 13 (11.9%). The median times to RBO and RDO from DS were 87 and 76 days, respectively. Placement of a duodenal uncovered self-expandable metal stent (U-SEMS) was significantly associated with RBO in the multivariable analysis (p = 0.007). Time to RBO was significantly longer in the duodenal covered self-expandable metal stent (C-SEMS) group than in the U-SEMS group (p = 0.003). No predictive factors of RDO were detected, and duodenal stent type was not associated with the time to RDO (p = 0.724). CONCLUSIONS: Double stenting was safe and effective for malignant bilioduodenal obstruction. Duodenal U-SEMS is a risk factor for RBO. C-SEMS is the preferred type of duodenal SEMS in patients with DS.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
ot applicable 至 ot applicable(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • Not obtained the consent

研究者

发起方
agoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences

相似试验