跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07579715
NCT07579715已完成不适用

Comparison Of Surgical Outcomes Between Ligation Of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract And Fistulotomy With Seton In The Management Of Perianal Fistula: An Analytical Comparative Study

Islamabad Medical and Dental College1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2026年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Fecal Continence Preservation

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare two commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of perianal fistula: Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) and fistulotomy with seton. Perianal fistula is a condition that can cause pain, discharge, and significant discomfort, and its treatment remains challenging due to the risk of recurrence and potential loss of bowel control after surgery.

The LIFT procedure is a sphincter-preserving technique designed to treat the fistula without damaging the muscles responsible for continence. In contrast, fistulotomy with seton involves placing a thread (seton) in the fistula tract followed by gradual or staged division of the tract, which may carry a higher risk of affecting continence.

In this study, 100 adult patients diagnosed with perianal fistula will be included and divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure they undergo: LIFT or fistulotomy with seton. The outcomes of both procedures will be compared in terms of wound healing time, recurrence of the fistula, postoperative pain, and preservation of bowel continence.

The results of this study will help determine which surgical technique provides better recovery, fewer complications, and improved quality of life for patients.

详细描述

Perianal fistula (fistula-in-ano) is a common anorectal condition characterized by an abnormal tract between the anal canal and perianal skin. It is associated with recurrent infection, discharge, and discomfort, and often requires surgical management. However, the ideal surgical technique remains controversial due to the balance required between complete eradication of the fistula tract and preservation of anal sphincter function.

Traditional surgical approaches such as fistulotomy involve laying open the fistula tract but may result in varying degrees of sphincter muscle division, leading to potential fecal incontinence. To overcome this limitation, sphincter-preserving techniques such as the Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) procedure have been introduced. LIFT involves identification and ligation of the fistula tract in the intersphincteric plane, thereby minimizing damage to the anal sphincter.

Fistulotomy with seton placement is another commonly practiced technique, especially for trans-sphincteric fistulas. The seton allows gradual drainage and fibrosis before definitive fistulotomy, potentially reducing the risk of uncontrolled sphincter division but still carrying a risk of incontinence.

Despite numerous international studies comparing these techniques, results remain inconsistent due to variations in study design, patient populations, and surgical expertise. Moreover, limited local data from Pakistan necessitates further research to guide clinical decision-making in this setting.

This analytical comparative study will be conducted at the Colorectal and General Surgery Department of Akbar Niazi Teaching Hospital, Islamabad. A total of 100 patients aged 18-65 years with primary trans-sphincteric or inter-sphincteric perianal fistula will be included using non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients will be allocated into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed: Group A (LIFT) and Group B (fistulotomy with seton).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

No masking will be applied in this study due to the nature of surgical interventions. Participants, surgeons, and outcome assessors will be aware of the assigned treatment.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 18-65 years, both males and females
  • Diagnosed with primary cryptoglandular perianal fistula
  • Trans-sphincteric or inter-sphincteric fistula confirmed clinically ± imaging/proctoscopy
  • Fit for surgery under anesthesia
  • Willing to provide written informed consent

排除标准

  • Recurrent perianal fistula (previous surgical intervention)
  • Fistula secondary to Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, or malignancy Immunocompromised patients
  • Pre-existing fecal incontinence (documented)
  • Severe comorbidities making surgery unsafe (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, severe hepatic/renal failure)
  • Pregnancy

研究组 & 干预措施

Lift Group

Active Comparator

Participants in this arm will undergo the Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) procedure for the management of primary trans-sphincteric or inter-sphincteric perianal fistula. This is a sphincter-preserving surgical technique in which the fistula tract is identified in the intersphincteric plane, ligated, and divided to close the internal opening while preserving anal sphincter integrity. Postoperative outcomes, including wound healing time, recurrence, postoperative pain, and faecal continence, will be assessed and compared with the fistulotomy with seton group during follow-up.

干预措施: Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) (Procedure)

Fistulotomy With Seton Group

Active Comparator

Participants in this arm will undergo fistulotomy with seton placement followed by definitive fistulotomy for the management of primary trans-sphincteric or inter-sphincteric perianal fistula. The seton is used initially to allow drainage and fibrosis of the fistula tract, followed by surgical laying open of the tract (fistulotomy) as definitive treatment. Postoperative outcomes, including wound healing time, recurrence rate, postoperative pain, and faecal continence, will be evaluated and compared with the LIFT group during scheduled follow-up visits.

干预措施: Fistulotomy with Seton Placement (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Fecal Continence Preservation

时间窗: 12 weeks

次要结局

  • Wound Healing Time(12 weeks)
  • Recurrence Rate(12 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Islamabad Medical and Dental College
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验