跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04483713
NCT04483713已完成不适用

Evidence-Based Practice: Proposed Application of Facilitating Tools for Clinical Nurses

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 29 人开始时间: 2020年12月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
29
试验地点
2
主要终点
Questionnaire to check the suitability of the authorized translation of the portuguese language version of the johns hopkins evidence-based practice guide tools.

研究概览

简要总结

Randomized study of educational intervention, comparative and prospective about Evidence Based Practice (EBP) and its application by clinical nurses in the implementation of EBP projects in search of best practice in nursing processes.

详细描述

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) has become an important issue in nursing. It is considered a process consisting of sequential steps. Multiple barriers are found, among them, time restriction, lack of personal motivation, professional resistance to research and inadequate knowledge. The proposal of this study is to provide Brazilian clinical nurses with tools to be used as a guide, with a structured process in stages as a facilitator of the implementation of EBP projects in search of best practice in nursing processes, for this the investigators will verify the adequacy of authorized translation of the Portuguese version of the Johns Hopkins Center for Evidence-Based Practice guide tools and whether these tools are facilitators in structuring and describing an EBP project from the perspective of the clinical nurse, in addition to verifying whether the EBP project met the requirements of preparation from the perspective of the researcher.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Clinical nurse with a minimum of two years of training in nursing undergraduate
  • Self-referred intermediate English for reading

排除标准

  • Have previously participated in an EBP project, EBP council or research project, or have a master's or doctor's degree.

结局指标

主要结局

Questionnaire to check the suitability of the authorized translation of the portuguese language version of the johns hopkins evidence-based practice guide tools.

时间窗: Change from Baseline suitability of the translation of the portuguese language version of the johns hopkins PBE guide tools at immediate post this intervention, an average of 3 months.

The questionnaire have closed-ended question about the intelligibility of translation for experts, with the possibility of answering yes or no, and an open field for suggestions for changes. In case of inadequacy (which we define as less than four yes answers for the tools), we will make the changes cited by the experts and submit the changed tools to a further expert evaluation.

Compliance verification questionnaire in the exercise of preparing a PBE project, from the researcher's perspective.

时间窗: Change from Baseline Compliance verification in the exercise of preparing a PBE project, from the researcher's perspective, at immediate post intervention, through study completion, an average 1 year.

This tool have five closed questions to verify compliance with the basic requirements and key elements of an EBP project. The closed questions are related to the description of a clinical question with answer possibilities (yes; no), about survey of bibliographic articles with answer possibilities (Sufficient; Partially sufficient; Insufficient), about the classification of evidence according to the level of quality, elaboration of synthesis of the findings relating to the levels of evidence and ability to develop a dissemination plan for the implementation of the PBE project , with answer possibilities ( Yes; Partially; No). The latter answers are associated with a poor conformity in the exercise of structuring and describing an evidence-based practice project from the researcher's perspective.

Questionnaire for the evaluation of the structuring process and description of an evidence-based practice project, from the perspective of the clinical nurse.

时间窗: Change from Baseline evaluation of the structuring process and description of an evidence-based practice project, from the perspective of the clinical nurse, at immediate post intervention, through study completion, an average 1 year.

The instrument has seven questions and one open for comments. The closed questions are related to the description of a clinical question with answer possibilities (very slow; slow; fast; very fast), ease in searching for evidence (challenging; difficult; easy; very easy), understanding of scientific articles (not understandable; partially understandable; understandable; totally understandable), ease in summarizing and classifying the levels of evidence and ease in describing the application of evidence with (challenging; difficult; easy; very easy), elaborating an action plan for disseminating the evidence, in addition to the ease of going through all the phases of a PBE project in relation to the material offered during the workshop (with or without Johns Hopkins tools) with answer possibilities (not helpful; partially helpful; helpful; very helpful), the latter responses are associated with greater ease in the process of structuring and describing an evidence-based practice project.

次要结局

  • Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ)(Change from de Baseline Evidence-Based Practice at immediate post intervention, through study completion, an average 1 year.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验