跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/11/077125
CTRI/2024/11/077125已完成Unknown

Comparison of the efficacy of Intranasal Atomised Ketodex versus Intranasal Atomised Midazolam as a Premedicant for anxiolysis and sedation in children aged 1 to 10 years undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery- A randomized double-blinded controlled trial.

Ankur Luthra1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2025年11月17日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
已完成
发起方
Ankur Luthra
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Comparison of the effectiveness of sedation between intranasal atomised ketodex versus midazolam in children aged 1 to 10 years undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery by University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS).

研究概览

简要总结

Preoperative anxiety can occur in as much as 80% of surgical patients.11 Two vulnerable groups of patients are females and children. While most female adults are usually concerned about the uncertainty of their future, their family, the success of the operation, and the safety of anaesthesia, the children, by contrast, will experience varying degrees of separation anxiety before an operation. Both psychological and pharmacological approaches are effective in decreasing preoperative anxiety. A child’s preoperative anxiety can pose a significant challenge for the anaesthetic team and can be distressing for parents. Evidence suggests that preoperative anxiety is associated with adverse outcomes, both clinical (increased requirements for analgesics and emergence delirium) and behavioural (sleep disturbances and enuresis)12Various drugs have been used as premedication to allay anxiety and facilitate the smooth separation of the child from parents such as midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, melatonin and sufentanil.1 The ideal premedicant should be readily acceptable and should have a rapid onset of action, reliable effect and faster recovery from the sedative effect of the drug. Since there is a discrepancy in the results of various studies on the superiority of the atomised form of one drug given intranasally over another and there is no study comparing the effectiveness of intranasal atomised ketodex versus midazolam for premedication in children aged 1 to 10 years of age. Therefore, we would like to compare the effectiveness of intranasal atomised ketodex using dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg and ketamine at a dose of 3 mg/kg with intranasal atomised midazolam 0.4 mg/kg in children aged 1 to 10 years for premedication undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery and we hypothesize that intranasal atomized ketodex will be non-inferior to intranasal midazolam as a premedicant for anxiolysis and sedation in children aged 1-10 years undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
1.00 Year(s) 至 10.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 70 ASA I and II children aged between 1-10 years who were scheduled for spinal dysraphism surgery will be enrolled in this study.

排除标准

  • Refusal of consent Known allergy to dexmedetomidine or ketamine ASA III or IV Children with cardiac anomalies Children with seizures Children with upper respiratory tract infection Children with liver disease Children with mental retardation Difficult cannulation (three or more attempts).

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of the effectiveness of sedation between intranasal atomised ketodex versus midazolam in children aged 1 to 10 years undergoing spinal dysraphism surgery by University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS).

时间窗: 30 minutes after drug administration

次要结局

  • To compare the response to parental separation assessed by Parental Separation Anxiety Score (PSAS)(30 min after drug administration)
  • To compare the successful rate of venous canulation assessed by the Groningen Distress Rating Score (GDRS)(30 min after drug administration)
  • To compare mask acceptance assessed by the Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS)(30 min after drug administration)
  • To compare the hemodynamic changes (HR, MAP, SpO2)(35 min, 40 min, 45 min, 50 min, 55 min, 60 min, 65 min, 70 min, 75 min, 80 min, 85 min and 90 min after drug administration)
  • To compare the incidence of Emergence agitation assessed by using the WATCHA Scale(At the end of surgery and anaesthesia)
  • To compare the time for post operative discharge from Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) by Modified Aldrete Scoring(At the end of PACU stay)

研究者

发起方
Ankur Luthra
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Ankur Luthra

Postgraduate institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验