跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04442321
NCT04442321已完成不适用

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve With Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia

Universidad Complutense de Madrid1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2020年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Changes in Elbow Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods

研究概览

简要总结

Lateral epicondylalgia is a common musculoskeletal condition that approximately affects 1-3% of the general population. Several authors have found greater mechanical pain sensitivity in the radial nerve when compared with healthy subjects. Radial tunnel syndrome exhibits a similar clinical presentation to lateral epicondylalgia. Percutaneous electrical stimulation has shown reduce pain in several conditions. Percutaneous electrical stimulation on the radial nerve could cause an important relief in lateral epicondylalgia.

Hypothesis: Percutaneous electrical stimulation on radial nerve plus exercise therapy in patients with lateral epicondylalgia is better than sham percutaneous electrical stimulation plus exercise.

详细描述

Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS). PENS is technique to provide a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current throughout needling filaments place close to the nerve.

Study Aims:

Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, mid and long-term of PENS on intensity of pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale and disability as measured by Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.

Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PENS on disability as measured by DASH questionnaire, and psychological factors (fear and avoidance and catastrophism) and Global Rating of Change (GRoC) in patients with lateral epicondylalgia with random assignment to two treatments: PENS plus exercise program or Sham PENS plus exercise program.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Lateral epicondylalgia symptoms confirmed with at least 2 of the 4 following test:
  • •pain during palpation of lateral epicondyle
  • •pain on resisted wrist extension
  • •pain on resisted middle finger extension
  • •pain during hand-grip.

排除标准

  • •History of fractures, luxations, surgery and/or musculoskeletal disorders in upper limb.
  • •Neurological disorders, inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases.
  • •Having received as treatment techniques that involve needles on the previous 6 months to study enrollment, or having received percutaneous electrical stimulation as a treatment before.
  • •Cervical pathology, fibromyalgia, unstable cardiovascular diseases, pregnant women or under suspect of pregnancy.
  • •Contraindications of needle's insertions: anticoagulant therapy, needle phobia, diabetes, hypothyroidism, lymphoedema, muscular diseases).
  • •Contraindications of electrical current application.

研究组 & 干预措施

PENS plus exercise group

Active Comparator

Experimental: PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently . It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.

干预措施: PENS plus exercise (Other)

Sham PENS plus exercise group

Sham Comparator

Sham Comparator: Sham PENS plus exercise group 4-week intervention program with 1 weekly treatment session, one of percutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition, self-management loaded exercise, prescribed by the physical therapist but completed by the patient independently. It involved isometric exercises, eccentric exercise, eccentric-concentric with weight or resistive therapeutic band.

干预措施: Sham PENS plus exercise (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Changes in Elbow Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods

时间窗: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

Pain intensity measured with a 10 (0 - No pain - 10 The worst pain) numeric rating scale

次要结局

  • Changes in Elbow Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up periods(Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention)
  • Changes in Upper Extremity Related-Disability between baseline and follow-up period(Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention)
  • Changes in Kinesiophobia between baseline and follow-up periods(Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention)
  • Changes in Self-perceived Improvement between baseline and follow-up periods(Baseline,1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention)
  • Changes in Pain Catastrophizing between baseline and follow-up periods(Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验