CTRI/2026/02/104828尚未招募不适用
PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY AND TIME EFFICIENCY OF THE SALINE FLUSH ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY TEST COMPARED WITH CHEST RADIOGRAPHY FOR CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER TIP LOCALIZATION IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS
Manas Omer1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 154 人开始时间: 2026年3月8日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 154
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of saline flush echocardiography test compared to chest X-ray for confirming central venous catheter tip position
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective comparative study evaluates the accuracy and time efficiency of saline flush echocardiography test versus chest radiography for confirming central venous catheter tip position in ICU patients. CVCs will be inserted using the Peres formula, followed by both saline flush test and chest X-ray. The study aims to determine if echocardiography provides comparable accuracy with faster confirmation times.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult patients (18 to 90 years) admitted to ICU requiring central venous catheterization CVC insertion through internal jugular or subclavian vein using ultrasound guidance Written informed consent obtained.
排除标准
- •Femoral central venous catheter insertions PICC or totally implantable port devices Known cardiac anomalies or congenital heart disease or severe heart failure Poor echocardiographic windows Patients on ECMO.
结局指标
主要结局
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of saline flush echocardiography test compared to chest X-ray for confirming central venous catheter tip position
时间窗: Baseline
次要结局
- Time taken for CVC tip position confirmation using saline flush test compared to chest X-ray
研究者
MANAS OMER
MAX SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL (MAX SAKET)
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Laparoscopic Ultrasound Versus Fluorescence Cholangiography in Technically Challenging Laparoscopic CholecystectomyNCT07400237Consorci Sanitari Integral62
Enrolling By Invitation
不适用
Consistency of Fluid Tolerance Evaluation Methods and Their Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ShockNCT07373717Southeast University, China45
尚未招募
2 期
Finding out how deep the needle should go for spinal anaesthesia comparing ultrasound scan with a simple body measurement method.CTRI/2025/11/096788Vardhman Mahavir medical college and Safdarjung hospital45
尚未招募
不适用
“Evaluating Block Onset, Ease of Performance and Safety in different costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Medial and Lateral by using ultrasound in patients undergoing upper limb surgeryCTRI/2025/10/095886Dr Bahadur Singh57
招募中
不适用
Ultrasound-Guided RSCTL vs EOIP Block for Analgesia in Sleeve GastrectomyNCT07311525Beni-Suef University90