A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Golcadomide Plus R-CHOP Chemotherapy vs Placebo Plus R-CHOP Chemotherapy in Participants with Previously Untreated High-risk large B-cell Lymphoma (GOLSEEK-1)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 850
- 试验地点
- 8
- 主要终点
- To evaluate the efficacy of golcadomide plus R-CHOP vs placebo-R-CHOP in participants with untreated high-risk large B-cell lymphoma with respect to PFS as assessed by the investigator.
研究概览
简要总结
This randomized, Phase 3 study has been designed as an add-on placebo-controlled study where golcadomide has been added to the established standard of care (SOC), which is R-CHOP in the experimental arm while placebo in combination with R-CHOP will comprise the control arm. For almost 2 decades, R-CHOP chemotherapy has remained the standard of care for untreated LBCL patients. The chemotherapy regimen and dosing for CHOP was established in the 1970s, and the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (R) was approved in 2006 based on 3 large, randomized studies, which consistently demonstrated a survival benefit in favor of the R-CHOP combination. Since then, multiple clinical trials have sought to improve upon R-CHOP in the 1L setting. Unfortunately, all failed to demonstrate improved outcomes compared to R-CHOP alone. Recently, however polatuzumab in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) was approved in the US and EU for the treatment of adult patients with untreated DLBCL, NOS or HGBL, and an IPI score of 2 or greater based on the results from the Phase 3 POLARIX study. Additionally, based on these results, pola-R-CHP was recently made a category 1 recommendation alongside R-CHOP for the first-line treatment of patients with LBCL in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Double
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •A) · Participant has histologically confirmed (per local evaluation) diagnosis of de novo, previously untreated LBCL according to 2022 WHO classification including: 1) DLBCL, NOS (including GCB and ABC types) 2) High-grade B-cell lymphoma, with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements 3) High-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS 4) T-cell/histiocyte/rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) 5) EBV plus DLBCL B) · Participant has: 1) IPI score 1 or 2 with LDH more than equal to 1.3 x ULN and/or bulky disease defined as single lesion of more than equal to 7 cm OR IPI more than equal to 3 2) Measurable disease defined by at least 1 FDG-avid lesion for FDG-avid subtype and 1 bi- dimensionally measurable (more than 1.5 cm in longest diameter) disease by CT or MRI, as defined by the Lugano classification.
- •Participants must have Ann Arbor Stage II-IV disease.
排除标准
- •· Participant has any significant medical condition, active infection, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the participant from participating in the study.
- •· Participant has any other subtype of lymphoma.
- •Cases of PMBCL, primary cutaneous DLBCL-leg type, Grade 3b FL, FL transformed to a-BCL, ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma, PEL, Burkitt lymphoma are excluded.
- •· Participant has documented or suspected CNS involvement by lymphoma.
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate the efficacy of golcadomide plus R-CHOP vs placebo-R-CHOP in participants with untreated high-risk large B-cell lymphoma with respect to PFS as assessed by the investigator.
时间窗: At baseline, 24 Months and until Progression free survival up to 5 years or study achieves endpoints
次要结局
- To evaluate the efficacy of golcadomide plus(R-CHOP vs placebo-R-CHOP)
- To evaluate the efficacy of golcadomide plus(R-CHOP vs placebo-R-CHOP in participants)
- evaluate the efficacy of golcadomide plus(R-CHOP vs placebo-R-CHOP in participants)
研究者
Shilpi Sinha
Bristol Myers Squibb India Pvt. Ltd.
