False Safety Behavior Elimination Therapy: A Randomized Study of a Brief Individual Transdiagnostic Treatment for Anxiety Disorders
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 28
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of the current study was to test the efficacy of an individually administered, brief (5-session) transdiagnostic treatment for anxiety disorders. The current treatment (called F-SET) focuses chiefly on the elimination of anxiety maintaining behaviors and cognitive strategies (so-called "safety" aids) among individuals suffering from a range of anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD) and panic disorder (PD). We hypothesized that the F-SET protocol would produce better overall outcome relative to a waitlist control.
详细描述
The aim of the current study was to test the efficacy of an individually administered, brief (5-session) transdiagnostic treatment for anxiety disorders. The current treatment (called F-SET) focuses chiefly on the elimination of anxiety maintaining behaviors and cognitive strategies (so-called "safety" aids) among individuals suffering from a range of anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD) and panic disorder (PD).
Four primary hypotheses were evaluated in the current study: (1) the F-SET protocol would produce better overall outcome relative to a waitlist control, (2) the F-SET protocol would yield clinically significant improvement of primary diagnosis symptoms as well as secondary diagnosis symptoms, (3) the F-SET protocol would create treatment improvement that is maintained during a 1 month follow-up interval and (4) given that reduction of safety aid use is the key mechanism of change in the F-SET treatment, a reduction in safety aid use will mediate the relationship between pre and post treatment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Participants must have a primary diagnosis of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, or social anxiety disorder.
- •No change in medication type or dose during the 12 weeks prior to treatment
排除标准
- •Current or past schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or organic mental disorder
研究组 & 干预措施
Transdiagnostic Treatment (F-SET)
F-SET treatment consisted of five weekly individual sessions (approximately 50 minutes each). The F-SET protocol is consistent with current CBT protocols for anxiety disorders.
干预措施: Transdiagnostic Treatment (F-SET) (Behavioral)
Waitlist
The waitlist control condition was comprised of patients randomly assigned to the waitlist condition (WL). Individuals in this condition were reassessed after five weeks and were then offered treatment, but were no longer followed.
结局指标
主要结局
The Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV
时间窗: One Month Follow-up
Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID-IV). The SCID-IV (Spitzer, Gibbon, \& Williams, 1996) is a structured diagnostic interview designed to provide detailed coverage of Axis-I disorders. The SCID-IV has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition-text revision; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) Axis I disorders (Zanarini et al., 2000).
Clinician Global Impressions Scale (CGI) - Severity of Illness Subscale
时间窗: One Month Follow-up
Clinician Global Impressions Scale (CGI) - Severity of Illness Subscale. The CGI (Guy, 1976) is a widely used clinician-rated measure of global impressions. The severity of illness subscale from the CGI is composed of a 7-point scale (ranging from 0=not at all ill to 6=among the most extremely ill patients) and is used to assess
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
时间窗: One Month Follow-up
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). The WSAS is a 5-item descriptive measure of subjective interference in various life domains (i.e., work, home management, private leisure, and family relationships). Interference in the past week is rated from 0 (not at all interfering) to 8 (severe interference). The WSAS has demonstrated good internal consistency and has been successfully used in previous studies (e.g., Brown \& Barlow, 1995; Ellard, Fairholme, Boisseau, Farchione, \& Barlow, 2010). The WSAS was used as an index of overall disability and impairment. The WSAS demonstrated good internal consistency in the present sample (mean inter-item correlation = .28).
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Norman Schmidt
Professor
Florida State University