跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00101868
NCT00101868已完成不适用

Value of Technology to Transfer Discharge Information

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 631 人开始时间: 2004年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
631
试验地点
2
主要终点
Hospital Readmission, at Least One

研究概览

简要总结

The transition from hospital to home is a high-risk period in a patient's illness. Poor communication between healthcare providers at hospital discharge is common and contributes to adverse events affecting patients after discharge. The importance of good communication at discharge will increase as more primary care providers delegate inpatient care to hospitalists. Any process that improves information transfer among providers at discharge might improve the health and safety of patients discharged from U.S. hospitals each year, and to appreciably reduce unnecessary healthcare expenditures. Information transfer among healthcare providers and their patients can be undermined because of inaccuracies, omissions, illegibility, logistical failure (e.g., information is never delivered), and delays in generation (i.e., dictation or transcription) or transmission. Root causes include recall error, increased physician workloads, interface failures (e.g., physician-clerical) and poor training of physicians in the discharge process. Many of the deficiencies in the current process of information transfer at hospital discharge could be effectively addressed by the application of information technology. The proposed study will measure the value of a software application to facilitate information transfer at hospital discharge. The study is designed to compare the benefits of discharge health information technology versus usual care in high-risk patients recently discharged from acute care hospitalization. The design is a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. The outcomes are readmission within 6 months, adverse events, and effectiveness and satisfaction with the discharge process from the patient and physician perspectives. The cost outcome is the physician time required to use the discharge software.

详细描述

Objectives: The study is designed to compare the benefits of discharge health information technology versus usual care in high-risk patients recently discharged from acute care hospitalization.

STUDY HYPOTHESES:

The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients readmitted at least once within 6 months after the index admission. Readmission is for any reason and includes observation status and full admission status.

Primary hypothesis: Among high-risk patients recently discharged from acute care hospitalization, there is a significant decrease in the primary efficacy endpoint for patients who receive discharge health information technology versus usual care discharge instructions.

Secondary hypothesis 1A: In the same patient population, the time to first readmission is greater for patients who receive discharge health information technology versus usual care discharge instructions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Inpatients at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
  • Discharged by the hospitalist service or other inpatient services
  • High risk for poor post-discharge outcomes defined as probability of readmission (PRA) 0.4 or above

排除标准

  • Less than 18 years old
  • Unwilling or unable to provide written consent
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Will receive outpatient care from a primary care physician who is the same as the discharging physician
  • Do not speak English or Spanish
  • Not alert and oriented when admitted
  • Do not have telephone for post-discharge contact
  • Do not reside in Central Illinois
  • Will be discharged to a nursing home
  • Previously enrolled as subjects in the trial

结局指标

主要结局

Hospital Readmission, at Least One

时间窗: within 6 months after discharge

Number of participants with at least one readmission within 6 months after discharge from index hospital visit

次要结局

  • Patients' Perception of Discharge Process, Effectiveness, Satisfaction, Preparedness(1 week after discharge)
  • Patients' Perception of Discharge Process, Satisfaction(1 week after discharge)
  • Pharmacist Needed to Clarify the Discharge Prescription(1 day after discharge)
  • Pharmacist's Satisfaction With Discharge Prescription(1 day after discharge)
  • At Least One Adverse Event Within One Month After Discharge(1 month after discharge)
  • Patient's Satisfaction With Drug Information(1 week after discharge)
  • Primary Care Physician's Perception, Effectiveness(10 days after discharge)
  • Primary Care Physician's Perception, Satisfaction(10 days after discharge)
  • Discharge Physician Satisfaction With Discharge Process(6 months after using discharge process)
  • Number of Outpatient Visits(within 6 months after discharge)
  • Number of Emergency Department Visits(within 6 months after discharge)
  • Physician Time Spent to Complete the Discharge Application(averaged over 2 years of patient enrollment)

研究者

发起方
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

james f. graumlich

Professor of Medicine

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验