Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy with concomitant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma- a single institutional Randomised Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 110
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To assess the treatment response in both the arms as per RECIST 1.1, or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1
研究概览
简要总结
In India, according to GLOBOCAN 2022, cancers of Lip and Oral Cavity are the 2nd most
prevalent. Similarly, cancer of larynx stands 13th in rank in distribution of new cases and in
death due to cancers in 2022.
Whereas, Hypopharynx, Oropharynx and Nasopharynx stand on 15th, 16th, 27th rank
respectively in distribution of new cancer cases in 2022. Death due to these cancers hold rank
20th, 17th and 25th respectively for Hypopharynx, Oropharynx and Nasopharynx. Tobacco
smoking and chewing is commonest known etiological factor.
Management of loco-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with
curative intent has evolved considerably over time with active research, volumes of literature,
large randomized control trials and meta-analyses supporting evidence-based guidelines [3].
Attempts to cure such patients with aggressive multimodality treatment or intense radiotherapy
regimens have not succeeded till date. The 5-year survival even with aggressive multimodal
approach is reported to be <20%, with a median survival less than 12 months.
Strategies that modulate the biological response of tumours or normal tissues to radiation
include altered fractionation schedules, combined modality treatments using chemotherapeutic
agents and more recently biological agents targeting molecular processes and signalling
pathways. Altered fractionation schedules seek to improve the therapeutic ratio between
tumour cell kill and normal tissue damage by exploiting the dissociation between acute and
late radiation effects.There is no doubt that hypofractionation offer potential benefits to the
patients and economy of health system, but their clinical implementation should not be at the
expense of a lower likelihood of tumour control or a greater adverse effect on normal
tissue.[4][5] The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic
has developed an interest in hypofractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) in few malignancies,
including locally advanced head and neck cancer.
Furthermore, besides the evident logistical advantages, radiobiological modelling suggests that
3.0 Gy per fraction or accelerated hyperfractionation schedules (1.8 Gy per fraction with two
fractions per weekday) are considerably more effective for head and neck tumour control and
for the reduction in late effects than the standard 2Gy fractionation.
Finding a hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule along with concurrent chemotherapy with
radical intent or with the aim of a prolonged local control with equivalent toxicity as compared
to standard regimen would be significantly advantageous in this group of patients. The External
Beam Radiation most commonly given to patients with Head and Neck cancer not intervening
into any surgery is 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7weeks. The treatment continues for at least 7
weeks. Treatment with Radiotherapy develops some acute effects like mucositis, radiation
dermatitis, xerostomia, viscous mucous production, dysphagia, dyspnoea, dysgeusia, pain due
to inflammatory reaction and the production of reactive oxygen species causing damage to
mucosa and soft tissue
The aim of this study is to identify whether Hypofractionated (55 Gy, 20F, 5F/wk. over 4
weeks) with weekly cisplatin shows similar results to Conventional (70 Gy, 35F, 5F/wk. over
7 weeks) with weekly cisplatin with respect to both loco-regional tumour control and Grade 3+
late adverse events
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Histological and cytological proven cases of stage II- IVb Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Primary tumor sites Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx.
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
To assess the treatment response in both the arms as per RECIST 1.1, or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1
时间窗: During treatment patients will be examined weekly. After treatment all the patients will be followed up every month for the next 6 months and then every three months till the end of the follow-up period | Locoregional Control will be assessed 12weeks after completion of EBRT using same imaging modality used at baseline
次要结局
- To assess the toxicity (Acute and late) in both arms using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 6.0)(To assess quality of life in both the arms as per EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN43)
研究者
Abhishek Basu
Department of Radiation Oncology at Burdwan Medical College and Hospital
