Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy : a Comparative Study of Macintosh and GLIDESCOPE Ranger®
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 撤回
- 主要终点
- IDS score in each group
研究概览
简要总结
The objective of this work is to compare standard intubation with video laryngoscope (Glide scope Ranger ) in French pre hospital multicentric study.
详细描述
Introduction
In France, patients in critical status brought to hospital by emergency physicians and nurses experimented in tracheal intubation. It is an invasive act allowing a protection of airways and an optimal oxygenation of the patients in distress. The reference technique is the direct laryngoscopy by Macintosh . Corresponding data shows that a video laryngoscope - GLIDESCOPE laryngoscope - improve the conditions of intubation in the surgical unit thanks to a better display(visualization) of the opening. A derived device for pre hospital emergency units (GLIDESCOPE Ranger®) deserves to be compared with the classic laryngoscopy in emergency conditions.
Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method
Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients of more than 18 years old
- •requiring an intubation
- •by medical out of hospital emergency operators
- •medical insurance
- •Consent signed
排除标准
- •Age <18, pregnant women
- •Refusal of consent or inability for understanding study
- •small mouth opening makes it impossible intubate
研究组 & 干预措施
1: Classical intubation
干预措施: Classical intubation (Device)
2: Glidescope intubation
干预措施: GLIDESCOPE (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
IDS score in each group
时间窗: during the intubation
次要结局
- Hemodynamic instability(per intubation)
- Vomit / regurgitation or inhalation per-procedure(during the intubation)
- Dental or throat traumatism(during the intubation)
- Broncho/laryngospasm(during the intubation)
- Hypoxia(per intubation)
- Inhalation pneumonia(within 24 hours following the inclusion)
- Failure of intubate(during the intubation)